Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

3D Whole-heart Myocardial Tissue Analysis
Published on: April 12, 2017
Heart Replacement Therapy in Young Patients: A Comparative Analysis of HeartMate 3 LVAD and Heart Transplant Using
Nir Uriel1, Gabriel T Sayer1, Boaz Elad1
1Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Insights
For advanced heart failure patients under 50, durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy shows survival comparable to heart transplantation (HT). This suggests an LVAD-first strategy may be a viable initial heart replacement option.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Transplantation Medicine
Background:
- Younger patients (18-49) with advanced heart failure (HF) face unique challenges with advanced therapies.
- Heart transplantation (HT) offers good survival but has limited graft longevity.
- The HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) shows promise, but direct comparisons with HT in this age group are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare survival and adverse event (AE) outcomes between younger patients receiving HM3 LVAD support and those listed for or undergoing HT.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of patients aged 18-49 from the MOMENTUM 3 trial (HM3 cohort, n=420) and UNOS registry (HT listing/recipients, n=1,955).
- Propensity score matching was used to adjust for baseline differences.
- Outcomes assessed included 2-year survival, freedom from death/delisting, and 1-year incidence of major AEs (stroke, renal dysfunction, infection).
Main Results:
- Two-year survival was similar between HM3 and HT (88.7% vs 90.2%).
- HM3 showed higher freedom from death compared to freedom from death or delisting for deterioration in UNOS (90.1% vs 76.7%).
- HM3 recipients had lower rates of renal dysfunction (5.0% vs 10.4%) and infection hospitalizations (24.8% vs 34.2%), but a higher incidence of stroke (3.4% vs 0.3%).
Conclusions:
- Durable LVAD therapy, like HM3, offers survival comparable to HT in adults under 50.
- These findings support considering an LVAD-first strategy for heart replacement in selected younger patients.
- HM3 LVAD provides a viable alternative to HT for this demographic.
Background:
Younger patients (18-49 years of age) with advanced heart failure (HF) face unique challenges in decision-making for advanced HF therapies. Although heart transplantation (HT) offers excellent survival, it is associated with finite graft longevity. The HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has demonstrated promising outcomes, but direct comparisons with those listed for or undergoing HT in this age group remain limited.
Objectives:
This study sought to compare survival and adverse event (AE) outcomes between younger patients receiving HM3 LVAD support and those listed for or undergoing HT.
Methods:
The authors analyzed patients 18-49 years of age from the MOMENTUM 3 (Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3) portfolio (HM3 cohort; n = 420) and the UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) registry (HT listing cohort; n = 1,955) (HT recipients; n = 1,176) from 2014-2018. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline differences. Outcomes included 2-year survival from time of treatment or time of listing, freedom from death or delisting for deterioration, and 1-year incidence of major AEs (ie, stroke, renal dysfunction, infection).
Results:
After propensity score matching, 2-year survival from treatment was similar for HM3 and HT (88.7% vs 90.2%; HR: 1.18; P = 0.53). When comparing outcomes from time of transplant listing vs LVAD implantation, HM3 was associated with higher freedom from death compared with freedom from death or delisting due to deterioration in UNOS (90.1% vs 76.7%; HR: 0.38; P < 0.0001). AE analysis showed lower 1-year rates of renal dysfunction requiring dialysis (5.0% vs 10.4%; P = 0.016) and fewer infection-related hospitalizations (24.8% vs 34.2%; P = 0.012) in HM3 recipients, but a higher incidence of debilitating stroke (3.4% vs 0.3%; P = 0.027).
Conclusions:
Contemporary data suggest that durable LVAD therapy may offer survival outcomes comparable to HT in adults <50 years of age. These findings support the consideration of an LVAD-first strategy as a viable initial approach to heart replacement therapy in appropriately selected patients. (Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3 Investigational Device Exemption [MOMENTUM 3 IDE]; NCT02224755) (MOMENTUM 3 Continued Access Protocol [MOMENTUM 3 CAP]; NCT02892955).
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Anatomy of the Heart
Anatomy of the Heart
The heart has three layers: the innermost endocardium, the muscular myocardium, and the outer epicardium, all working together for optimal cardiac function.
Chambers of the Heart
The heart is made up of four...
ortho–para-Directing Activators: –CH3, –OH, –⁠NH2, –OCH3
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Overview of the Heart
The heart's structure...

