Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

09:04
A Modeling and Simulation Method for Preliminary Design of an Electro-Variable Displacement Pump
Published on: June 1, 2022
3.7K
A multiple surrogate simulation-optimization framework for designing pump-and-treat systems
Chaoqi Wang1, Zhi Dou1, Ning Chen2
1School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China.
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
|February 7, 2026
Summary
Optimizing groundwater cleanup using pump-and-treat (P&T) involves surrogate models. Combining multiple models like DNN, Kriging, and SVR enhances remediation scheme efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Hydrogeology
- Computational Science
Background:
- Pump-and-treat (P&T) is a key groundwater remediation technology.
- Optimizing P&T operations (well locations, pumping rates) is crucial for efficiency and cost reduction.
- Surrogate models coupled with optimization algorithms are emerging tools for P&T scheme formulation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of five surrogate models (Kriging, Polynomial Interpolation, SVR, RF, DNN) for predicting contaminant removal in P&T remediation.
- To explore the potential of combining multiple surrogate models for enhanced P&T optimization.
- To develop and evaluate a multi-surrogate optimization framework for groundwater remediation.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated five surrogate models: Kriging, Polynomial Interpolation, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), and Deep Neural Network (DNN).
- Assessed model predictive accuracy for contaminant removal efficiency across diverse P&T schemes.
- Developed a multi-surrogate optimization framework integrating all five models with a genetic algorithm.
Main Results:
- Deep Neural Network (DNN) showed the highest overall prediction accuracy, but no single model was consistently superior across all cases.
- A multi-surrogate framework combining diverse models leveraged complementary strengths.
- The optimized remediation schemes achieved superior contaminant removal (17.5% residual) compared to non-optimized schemes (19.2-21.7%).
Conclusions:
- Combining multiple surrogate models offers significant benefits for optimizing pump-and-treat remediation schemes.
- The developed multi-surrogate framework provides a robust tool for environmental management.
- This study advances surrogate-based optimization techniques for groundwater cleanup.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Pipe Systems
1.2K
Multipipe systems consist of complex configurations of interconnected pipes designed to transport fluids efficiently across intricate networks. They are essential in engineering applications requiring precise control over flow distribution, pressure, and head loss. They are categorized into series, parallel, loop, and network configurations, each distinguished by unique flow characteristics and applications.
Series Configuration
In a series configuration, fluid flows sequentially from one pipe...
Series Configuration
In a series configuration, fluid flows sequentially from one pipe...
1.2K
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
250
Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
250
ATP Driven Pumps III: V-type Pumps
4.9K
V-type pumps are ATP-driven pumps found in the vacuolar membranes of plants, yeast, endosomal and lysosomal membranes of animal cells, plasma membranes of a few specialized eukaryotic cells, and some prokaryotes. They are also known as the V1Vo-ATPase, that couple ATP hydrolysis to transport protons against a concentration gradient.
The peripheral or cytosolic V1 domain with eight subunits is involved in ATP hydrolysis. The integral or transmembrane V0 domain containing at least five subunits...
The peripheral or cytosolic V1 domain with eight subunits is involved in ATP hydrolysis. The integral or transmembrane V0 domain containing at least five subunits...
4.9K
ATP Driven Pumps II: P-type Pumps
6.4K
The P-type pumps are a large family of integral membrane transporter ATPases. They are divided into five major types based on substrate specificity, from I to V.
A typical P-type pump has three cytosolic domains: nucleotide-binding (N), phosphorylation (P), and activator (A) domains. These domains are connected to the membrane-spanning helices by short amino acid segments. ATP hydrolysis and covalent phosphoenzyme intermediate formation are crucial parts of the catalytic cycle. At the highly...
A typical P-type pump has three cytosolic domains: nucleotide-binding (N), phosphorylation (P), and activator (A) domains. These domains are connected to the membrane-spanning helices by short amino acid segments. ATP hydrolysis and covalent phosphoenzyme intermediate formation are crucial parts of the catalytic cycle. At the highly...
6.4K
Pumped Concrete
395
Concrete in large quantities can be pumped across long distances for placing in inaccessible sites. This system comprises a hopper that receives concrete from a mixer, a pump to propel the concrete, and pipelines that facilitate its delivery.
For direct-acting pumps, the concrete enters the pump via the inlet valve under the action of gravity and suction created by the movement of the piston. This concrete is then forced into the pipeline and out through the outlet valve by the forward movement...
For direct-acting pumps, the concrete enters the pump via the inlet valve under the action of gravity and suction created by the movement of the piston. This concrete is then forced into the pipeline and out through the outlet valve by the forward movement...
395
Group Design
10.7K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.7K

