Related Experiment Video For Biosensor
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Fabrication of 1-D Photonic Crystal Cavity on a Nanofiber Using Femtosecond Laser-induced Ablation
Published on: February 25, 2017
Effect of fabrication error on the sensitivity of a one-dimensional photonic crystal sensor for cancer detection
Ali Mohammadi1, Seyed Asghar Mohammadi1, Mehdi Hosseini2
1Department of Physics, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran.
Abstract:
One-dimensional photonic crystal (1D-PC) biosensors are promising for applications like cancer detection due to their high sensitivity, but their performance is often compromised by unavoidable fabrication errors. However, theoretical analyses often do not quantitatively assess the impact of these fabrication errors on key sensor performance parameters, such as sensitivity and peak width. This study addresses this issue by performing a statistical analysis to investigate how random fabrication deviations influence these performance metrics, thereby providing a more realistic evaluation of sensor stability and robustness. For a designed 1D-PC biosensor, the transmission spectrum was first calculated using the transfer matrix method (TMM). A statistical simulation was then performed to analyze how random errors in layer thickness affect the sensor's performance at various error levels (δ) and at two incidence angles, 0° and 85°, with 100 iterations per level. The results showed that as fabrication errors increase, the values for the transmission peak position and Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) deviate from their ideal, error-free state. The sensitivity also fluctuates around the ideal value. Interestingly, it was found that some sensor instances could achieve sensitivities higher than the ideal, error-free value. The findings confirm that the 85° incidence angle, previously optimized1 for high sensitivity, also provides enhanced resistance to fabrication errors compared to normal incidence, making it a robust choice for practical applications and guiding the design of more stable biosensors.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Fundamental Attribution Error
Ionic Crystal Structures
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
Random Error

