Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 9, 2026

Generation of a Rat Model of Acute Liver Failure by Combining 70% Partial Hepatectomy and Acetaminophen
Published on: November 27, 2019
Comparison of Two Artificial Liver Treatments for Acute Liver Failure: A Retrospective Observational Study
Xiulian Wu1, Dongxia Wu2, Xiaoqing Sun1
1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing You'an Hospital, Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Background:
Liver failure can lead to severe disorders in the body's metabolism, detoxification, synthesis and other functions, with a high mortality rate of 60%-90%. The dual plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) is a new artificial liver technology that has received much attention in recent years. However, it cannot provide coagulation factors, albumin or other substances during the treatment process and may even consume albumin during the adsorption process. The DPMAS typically needs to be used in combination with plasma exchange (PE). Few studies have compared PE alone and DPMAS + PE.
Aim:
This study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and nursing methods of different artificial liver treatments for patients with acute drug-induced liver injury.
Study Design:
The clinical data of patients with liver failure admitted to the intensive care unit of our hospital were retrospectively analysed to identify a PE group and a sequential PE group, comprising DPMAS with PE (DPMAS + PE). The changes in liver function and coagulation function index before and after treatment and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared.
Results:
In total, n = 57 patients (PE n = 14, DPMAS + PE n = 43) participated in the study. There was no significant difference in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or total bilirubin (TBIL) levels before treatment (p > 0.05). After treatment, ALT levels were higher in the PE group than in the DPMAS + PE group (317.72 ± 604.24 vs. 276.02 ± 763.04, respectively), whereas TBIL levels were lower in the former than in the latter (237.91 ± 124.34 vs. 297.95 ± 153.38). The international normalised ratio (INR) was higher in the DPMAS + PE group than in the PE group (1.84 ± 0.66 vs. 1.66 ± 0.72) and prothrombin activity (30.51 ± 7.91 vs. 34.62 ± 8.43) was lower, indicating that DPMAS + PE had a better effect on ALT and AST levels, but PE alone was more effective in improving TBIL and INR levels.
Conclusions:
The two artificial liver treatments can improve markers of liver function in patients with liver failure and help with liver function recovery.
Relevance To Clinical Practice:
Both artificial liver therapies effectively support patients awaiting transplantation. Successful management, particularly of the combined DPMAS + PE modality, demands specialised nursing expertise. Nurses must vigilantly monitor circuit pressure and coagulation parameters and adjust anticoagulant doses proactively to ensure treatment safety and efficacy.
Related Concept Videos
Liver Histology
Hepatocytes perform a variety of essential functions. They secrete...
Liver Physiology
Metabolic Regulation:
The liver is the central organ involved in regulating blood composition. It stabilizes blood glucose levels, maintaining them within the range of 70–110 mg/dL. When these levels drop, the liver breaks down glycogen reserves and releases glucose into the bloodstream. It can...
Liver Regeneration
Cells of Liver
The liver comprises four major types of cells— hepatocytes, stellate, Kupffer, and sinusoidal endothelial cells. The hepatocytes are...
Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...

