Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Calcifications on Panoramic Radiographs: A Meta-analysis
Fangfei Ye1, Qun Zhou2, Siying Zhang3
1Department of Stomatology, Shaoxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
None:
Carotid artery calcifications (CACs), a known risk factor for stroke, can be detected on panoramic radiographs (PRs). However, this clinically significant pathophysiological condition has long been underdiagnosed due to insufficient training and expertise among dentists. Artificial intelligence (AI) may serve as a valuable tool to aid dentists in detecting CACs on PRs. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of AI for CACs detection on PRs. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library up to 4 September 2025 without language limitation. The quality of studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. The performance of AI was assessed via the area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Meta-analysis was conducted on Stata 14.0. This systematic review identified 8 relevant articles, 7 of which were eligible for meta-analysis. The analysis was conducted from two perspectives: per-side (evaluating the left and right sides of participants separately) and per-person. In the per-side analysis, the summary estimates indicated high diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84-0.92), specificity was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.97), the PLR was 15.8 (95% CI: 9.0-27.6), the NLR was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.08-0.18), the DOR was 129 (95% CI: 55-305), and AUC was 0.96. The per-person analysis yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.74-0.97) and specificity of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.87). The corresponding PLR was 4.6 (95% CI: 3.1-7.0), NLR was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.04-0.36), DOR was 37 (95% CI: 10-144), and the AUC was 0.86. These results indicate that AI may serve as a valuable tool to assist dentists in detecting CACs on PRs. However, large-scale, evidence-based studies are still needed to validate these findings.
Related Concept Videos
Intelligence
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Multiple Intelligences Theory
Nursing Diagnosis
The nursing diagnosis focuses on evidence-based...
Cattell's Theory of Intelligence
Fluid intelligence involves the capacity to solve new problems and adapt to unfamiliar situations. It's the type of intelligence individuals use when they encounter a novel problem or puzzle that requires innovative thinking. For instance, figuring out how to operate a new gadget relies heavily on...

