Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Published on: March 25, 2022
Sphincterotomy during endoscopic biliary drainage in cholangitis with sepsis-induced coagulopathy increases bleeding
Yasuhisa Hiroshima1, Ryota Sagami2, Naosuke Kuraoka3
1Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Insights
Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) increases bleeding risk in acute cholangitis (AC) patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC). Biliary drainage without EST minimizes bleeding while maintaining clinical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Hepatology
- Endoscopic Procedures
Background:
- Acute cholangitis (AC) is a severe condition requiring urgent biliary drainage.
- Endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is common but carries bleeding risks, especially in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC).
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess adverse events (AEs) and clinical outcomes of EBD with or without EST in AC patients with SIC.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective multicenter cohort study.
- Propensity score matching used to compare outcomes between EST and non-EST groups.
- Primary endpoint: AE rate difference; Secondary endpoints: clinical outcomes.
Main Results:
- Higher AE incidence, particularly bleeding, in the EST group (16.7% vs. 1.8%).
- Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) incidence did not differ significantly between groups (4.2% vs. 1.2%).
- No significant difference in clinical success or 28-day survival rates.
Conclusions:
- EST significantly elevates bleeding risk in AC patients with SIC.
- EBD without EST effectively minimizes bleeding risk without compromising biliary drainage or clinical outcomes.
Background:
Acute cholangitis (AC) is life-threatening, requiring urgent biliary drainage. Endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD), often combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), may prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP). However, sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) increases bleeding risk, raising concerns about EST safety.
Aims:
To evaluate the risk of adverse events (AEs) and clinical outcomes associated with EBD with or without EST in patients with AC and SIC.
Methods:
In this retrospective multicentre cohort study, data from enrolled patients were analysed using propensity score matching, and outcomes were compared between EST and non-EST groups. The primary endpoint was the AE rate difference between EBD with and without EST. Secondary endpoints included differences in clinical outcomes.
Results:
Among 238 patients, 72 underwent EST and 166 did not. The AE incidence, particularly bleeding-related (11.1% vs. 0.6%, P<.001), was higher in the EST group (16.7% vs. 1.8%, P<.001) while PEP incidence (4.2% vs. 1.2%, P=.143) did not differ. Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed these findings. Clinical success or 28-day survival rates did not differ significantly.
Conclusion:
EST significantly increases bleeding risk in patients with AC and SIC without reducing PEP incidence or improving clinical outcomes. EBD without EST can minimise bleeding risk while maintaining adequate biliary drainage.
Related Concept Videos
Benefits of Self-Esteem
Bleeding in Fresh Concrete
Bleeding can cause several issues in the concrete structure. Sometimes, the rising water gets trapped beneath large aggregate...
Increasing Function
Cavity Drainage and Flashings in Masonry walls
Weep holes, strategically placed at the base of the cavity, are critical for draining accumulated water. These openings are created by leaving head...
Increased Body Temperature
Increased pulse rate
Many factors can elevate the risk of developing tachycardia. These include advanced age, a family history of arrhythmias, and an...

