Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

In Vivo Methods to Assess Retinal Ganglion Cell and Optic Nerve Function and Structure in Large Animals
Published on: February 26, 2022
Quantifying Transmembrane Water Exchange by Diffusion NMR Methods: From Yeast Cells to Optic Nerve Ex Vivo
Yuval Scher1,2,3,4, Shlomi Reuveni1,2, Yoram Cohen1,3
1School of Chemistry, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Comparing diffusion Magnetic Resonance (MR) methods, constant-gradient pulsed-field gradient (CG-PFG) and filter-exchange NMR spectroscopy (FEXSY), reveals differences in water exchange measurements. A new multicompartmental model improves accuracy for complex biological tissues like optic nerves.
Area of Science:
- Biophysics
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Diffusion NMR Spectroscopy
Background:
- Noninvasive measurement of molecular exchange is critical in various scientific fields, including materials and biological sciences.
- Accurate exchange measurements are essential for understanding multicompartmental systems studied by MR methods.
- Existing diffusion-exchange studies often lack direct comparability due to varying methodologies and experimental conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the constant-gradient pulsed-field gradient (CG-PFG) and filter-exchange NMR spectroscopy (FEXSY) methods for measuring apparent water exchange.
- To evaluate the performance of these methods in yeast cells and porcine optic nerves, both before and after fixation.
- To develop and validate improved models for analyzing diffusion-exchange data in complex biological systems.
Main Methods:
- Employed CG-PFG and FEXSY diffusion NMR techniques on yeast cells and optic nerves.
- Investigated the effect of q-values, repeatability, and reproducibility of measurements.
- Utilized Monte Carlo simulations and theoretical calculations to develop a tricompartmental model for optic nerve data analysis.
Main Results:
- Both CG-PFG and FEXSY showed similar qualitative trends in water exchange (mean residence times, MRTs) for yeast cells, though absolute values differed.
- A bicompartmental model was insufficient for optic nerve data; a derived tricompartmental model provided a significantly better fit.
- The tricompartmental model yielded considerably lower exchange rates for optic nerves compared to previous reports, potentially influenced by T2 differences.
Conclusions:
- CG-PFG and FEXSY are valuable tools for diffusion-exchange studies, but quantitative discrepancies may arise from factors like T2 relaxation differences.
- Optic nerves represent multicompartmental systems, necessitating advanced models beyond the simple bicompartmental approach for accurate analysis.
- Standardization of experimental protocols, comparative studies, and development of adequate modeling are crucial for advancing the diffusion-exchange field.
Related Concept Videos
Diffusion
Diffusion
Gas Exchange and Transport
Yeast Signaling
Water and Mineral Acquisition
Social Exchange Theory

