Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

An Adoptive Transfer Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Mice
Published on: June 6, 2025
Performance of the Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events Calculator in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Tate M Johnson1,2, Halie Frideres2, Punyasha Roul2
1Veterans Affairs (VA) Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, Nebraska.
Objective:
Evaluate performance of the Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events (PREVENT) calculator in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods:
Patients with RA were matched up to 10 controls on age, sex, and enrollment year using National Veterans Health Administration, Medicare, and National Death Index data (2006-2020). Ten-year estimated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk was calculated using PREVENT. Calibration (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] and observed/predicted events) and discrimination (sensitivity and Harrel's C-statistics) were compared between RA cases and controls. PREVENT performance was compared with the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) for atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) prediction in RA, including net reclassification index (NRI) calculation.
Results:
Among 30,687 patients with RA and 231,752 patients without RA, 28,061 ASCVD and 13,851 heart failure (HF) outcomes were identified over >2 million person-years. PREVENT underestimated overall CVD (SIR 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79-1.88), ASCVD (SIR 2.25, 95% CI 2.19-2.32) and HF risk (SIR 1.41, 95% CI 1.36-1.46) to a greater degree in RA compared with controls and exhibited poor sensitivity for ASCVD (61.9%) and HF (63.2%) development. PREVENT performance was poorer for ASCVD prediction compared with the PCE (SIR 1.38, 95% CI 1.34-1.41, sensitivity 76.0%). NRI for PREVENT was modest (5.3%). Among 657 reclassified patients who experienced ASCVD, 626 were inappropriately reclassified as low or borderline risk. PREVENT performance significantly improved when including hemoglobin A1c (overall CVD: SIR 1.21, 95% CI 1.18-1.24; ASCVD: SIR 1.45, 95% CI 1.41-1.50; HF: SIR 0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.82; sensitivity ASCVD 80.3%).
Conclusion:
PREVENT underestimates CVD risk in RA, consistent with suboptimal performance of existing risk calculators. Preferential use of PREVENT including hemoglobin A1c should be considered. Improving CVD risk stratification in RA remains a high priority.
More Related Videos
07:44Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass
Published on: July 14, 2023
09:31Generation of Induced-pluripotent Stem Cells Using Fibroblast-like Synoviocytes Isolated from Joints of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
Published on: October 16, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Calculating the Equilibrium Constant
For example, gaseous nitrogen dioxide forms dinitrogen tetroxide according to this equation:
Relative Risk
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes