Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

C. elegans Positive Butanone Learning, Short-term, and Long-term Associative Memory Assays
Published on: March 11, 2011
IOL tilt and decentration: a comparison of different haptic designs using CNN and SS-OCT in a short term
Jinhan Yao1, Kaiwen Li2, Feiyan Chai3
1Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Purpose:
To investigate the tilt and decentration differences and influencing factors of intraocular lenses (IOLs) with plate-haptic and C-loop haptic designs one month after cataract surgery, using the combination of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and a customized convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm.
Methods:
Participants were categorized into two groups based on the haptic design of their implanted IOLs. Group A included 37 patients (37 eyes) with the ATTORBI 709 M plate-haptic design, while Group B comprised 42 patients (42 eyes) with the PY-60 AD C-loop design. SS-OCT examinations were performed both before and one month after cataract surgery. A customized CNN algorithm was developed to generate data for IOL tilt and decentration, using the corneal vertex as a reference.
Results:
This study included 79 patients (79 eyes). Before surgery, there were no statistically significant differences in ocular parameters between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Significant difference in IOL decentration was observed (Group A & Group B: 0.16 ± 0.08 mm & 0.42 ± 0.28 mm, p < 0.001). In contrast, the difference in IOL tilt was not significant (Group A & Group B: 4.60 ± 1.27° & 4.63 ± 1.93°, p = 0.948). Both groups displayed a predominant inferotemporal tilt of the crystalline lens and IOL, but decentration did not show a distinct distribution pattern. Multivariate linear regression confirmed a correlation between IOL tilt in both groups and crystalline lens tilt (p < 0.003).
Conclusion:
The plate-haptic design IOL shows less decentration than the C-loop design. Clinicians should consider this potential difference in IOL stability when selecting IOLs with varying haptic designs.
Related Concept Videos
Factorial Design
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Long-term Depression
Group Design
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

