Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Design, Synthesis, and Photochemical Properties of Clickable Caged Compounds
Published on: October 15, 2019
Expandable Cage Versus Mesh Cage for the Treatment of Vertebral Osteomyelitis
Mitsuhiro Nishizawa1, Mladen Djurasovic2, Steven D Glassman2
1Orthopedic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, USA.
Abstract:
Background and objective Consensus regarding the optimal method for anterior column reconstruction in vertebral osteomyelitis has not been established. Direct comparisons between mesh and expandable cages have not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate differences in clinical outcomes, including revision rates, recurrence rates, complications, and costs, between these two reconstruction methods, as well as to identify independent risk factors for treatment failure in patients undergoing anterior column reconstruction with metal implants. Methods Clinical records of consecutive patients who underwent surgical intervention for vertebral osteomyelitis at a single institution between 2012 and April 2024 were reviewed. Patients who underwent anterior column debridement with either a mesh or an expandable cage, along with posterior fusion involving four or more levels, were included. Clinical outcomes, including nonunion, revisions, recurrence, and costs, were compared between the mesh and expandable cage groups. Results Ninety-two patients were included: 20 (22%) in the expandable cage group and 72 (78%) in the mesh cage group. The expandable cage group had a significantly higher nonunion rate (35% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.014) and revision rate (30% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.032). Costs were also higher in the expandable cage group, with a significant difference in in-hospital costs (Expandable: $77,737 ± 34,586; Mesh: $63,250 ± 27,899; p = 0.028). Multivariable analysis identified the number of fused levels (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.05-1.71; p = 0.024) and the use of an expandable cage (OR = 3.27, 95% CI: 1.04-11.02; p = 0.046) as independent risk factors for treatment failure, defined as revision surgery, recurrence, or mortality. Conclusions This study is the first to compare outcomes between expandable cages and mesh cages in patients with vertebral osteomyelitis. The findings suggest that the use of an expandable cage for reconstruction after anterior column debridement is associated with higher costs and increased risks of nonunion and revision surgery compared with mesh cages. Additionally, the use of an expandable cage was identified as an independent risk factor for treatment failure in vertebral osteomyelitis.
Related Concept Videos
The Thoracic Cage: Sternum
The sternum is the elongated bony structure on the anterior side of the thoracic cage. It consists of three parts: the manubrium, the body, and the xiphoid...
The Thoracic Cage: Ribs
Parts of a Typical Rib
A typical rib has a head, neck, and body. The posterior end of the rib is called the head, followed by a narrow neck. The head articulates primarily with the costal...
Mesh Analysis
A fundamental concept in mesh analysis is the definition of meshes and mesh currents. A mesh is a closed...
Muscles of the Vertebral Column
Superficial Layer:
The superficial layer consists primarily of the splenius muscles, which include the splenius capitis and splenius cervicis. These muscles are mainly responsible for the head and cervical spine movements, including extension, rotation, and lateral bending. The splenius capitis...
Articulations of the Vertebral Column
Mesh Analysis with Current Sources
Current Source in One Mesh: The analysis process is straightforward when a current source is found in only one mesh within the circuit. Mesh currents are assigned as usual, with the mesh containing the current source excluded from the analysis. Kirchhoff's voltage law...

