Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Versatility of Protocols for Resistance Training and Assessment Using Static and Dynamic Ladders in Animal Models
Published on: December 17, 2021
Impact of Caloric Restriction and Resistance Training on Weight Management, Insulin Sensitivity, and Adipose Tissue
Mohammad Mehrtash1, Mohsen Salesi2, Farhad Daryanoosh2
1Department of Exercise Physiology, Sports Science Faculty, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran, uk.ac.ir.
Background/Aims:
Obesity and insulin resistance induced by excessive calorie intake remain major health challenges. Caloric restriction (CR) and resistance training (RT) are known strategies to improve metabolic health, but their combined effects on lipid droplet-associated proteins and metabolic regulators remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of CR and RT, alone and in combination (CR + RT), on lipid droplet-associated proteins and signaling pathways in rats exposed to a high-fat diet (HFD).
Methods:
Fifty male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed HFD for 8 weeks and were then randomly assigned to five groups: HFD, normal-fat diet (NFD), CR, RT, and CR + RT. Each intervention was performed for 8 weeks following the initial 8-week HFD induction. Body weight, insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), and mRNA expression of perilipin 1 was measured in both adipose and skeletal muscle tissues, whereas perilipin 5, fat-specific protein 27 (FSP-27), adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1α), sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) were measured only in skeletal muscle after the subsequent 8-week intervention period.
Results:
At baseline, no significant differences in body weight were observed among the groups (p > 0.05). After 16 weeks, rats in HFD group exhibited the highest body weight (509.8 ± 6.0g), whereas CR + RT group showed the most pronounced reduction (292.2 ± 1.8 g; p < 0.001). Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was significantly elevated in the HFD group (5.55 ± 0.21) compared to all other groups, while the CR + RT group demonstrated the lowest value (1.24 ± 0.05), comparable to the normal diet group (p > 0.05). At the molecular level, CR + RT downregulated perilipin 1 and FSP-27, while significantly upregulating ATGL, AMPK, SIRT1, and PGC-1α compared to HFD (all p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Combined CR and RT produced superior benefits over either intervention alone, improving insulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism through coordinated regulation of lipid droplet proteins and metabolic signaling pathways. These findings suggest CR+RT as an effective strategy against diet-induced obesity.
Related Concept Videos
Weighted Mean
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Restriction Enzymes
The host bacteria protect their own genomic DNA from these enzymes by methylating these sites. Some...
Protein Dynamics in Living Cells
Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a fluorescent-protein-based detection technique used to quantify protein movement rates within the cell. This method exposes a small portion of the cell to an intense laser beam. The laser beam causes permanent photobleaching of the fluorophore-tagged proteins in the exposed region. As the bleached...
Impact of Groups on Groups
Atomic Weight
Mass and Weight

