Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Pupillary Response as Assessment of Effective Seizure Induction by Electroconvulsive Therapy
Published on: April 11, 2019
Variables associated with clinical outcomes and switching from unilateral to bitemporal electroconvulsive therapy: a
Erika Sordo1, Louise Fuet1, Federica Porpiglia1
1Institut de Neuromodulation, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire, Pôle Hospitalo-Universitaire Psychiatrie Paris 15, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Paris, France.
Background:
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) remains the most effective treatment for many patients with severe and/or resistant psychiatric disorders. Right unilateral (RUL) ECT, particularly when administered with titration and ultrabrief pulses, provides cognitive advantages compared with bitemporal (BT) ECT without compromising efficacy. However, some patients fail to improve and require switching to BT ECT. The present study aims to evaluate variables associated with efficacy and tolerability during RUL ECT and, when needed, after switching to BT ECT, aiming to identify factors linked to better outcomes with each placement.
Methods:
A retrospective review was conducted on 58 adult inpatients treated with RUL ECT. Patients without improvement after 4-6 sessions could be switched to BT ECT. Demographic, clinical, pharmacological, and electric seizure-related data were collected. Treatment response was classified as total, partial, or none. Tolerability was assessed based on common side effects. Group comparisons were performed between RUL and BT ECT periods, and between unswitched and switched patients. Supplementary analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between efficacy/tolerability and the studied variables.
Results:
Of the patients who began with RUL ECT, 18 (31%) were switched to BT ECT. Remission occurred in 40% with RUL ECT and reached 55% cumulatively after BT ECT. Adverse effect rates were comparable between groups. Compared to patients who continued with the RUL ECT, those requiring switching had more prior manic episodes (p < 0.05), higher current antipsychotic use (p < 0.05), and a tendency for ECT to be indicated more often for severity than for treatment resistance (p < 0.10). Within the switched subgroup, clozapine use and ECT charge increased during BT sessions compared to the RUL course (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Initiating treatment with RUL ECT and transitioning to BT ECT when necessary offers a pragmatic balance between tolerability and efficacy. Certain clinical variables may guide clinicians in anticipating the need for switching from a RUL to a BT setup.
More Related Videos
05:34A Mouse Model to Evaluate the Long-Term Structural and Functional Outcomes after the Reversal of Prolonged Unilateral Ureteric Obstruction
Published on: July 18, 2025
07:55The Optical Fractionator Technique to Estimate Cell Numbers in a Rat Model of Electroconvulsive Therapy
Published on: July 9, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Switching of BJT
Cut-off Mode ("Off" State): In this state, both the emitter-base and collector-base junctions are...
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...