Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Histone Variants at the Centromere02:30

Histone Variants at the Centromere

5.1K
Histone variants are the histone proteins with structural and sequence variations. These variants may be regarded as “mutant” forms that replace their canonical histone counterparts in the nucleosomes. Specific post-translational modifications on the histone variants enable further chromatin complexity and regulate tissue-specific gene expression. The most common histone variants are from histone H2A, H2B, and linker histone H1 families. However, several variants of histone H3...
5.1K
Passive Filters01:27

Passive Filters

1.0K
Passive filters are utilized to shape the frequency spectrum of signals across a diverse array of applications. These filters, using only passive elements like resistors (R), inductors (L), and capacitors (C), are capable of selectively allowing or blocking certain frequency ranges without the need for external power sources.
Low-Pass Filters
Low-pass filters are designed to transmit signals with frequencies lower than the cutoff frequency, ωc, and attenuate those above it. The cutoff...
1.0K
Active Filters01:25

Active Filters

1.3K
Active filters are electronic circuits that use operational amplifiers (op-amps), resistors, and capacitors to filter out unwanted frequency components from a signal. A first-order low-pass active filter is designed to pass signals with a frequency lower than a certain cutoff frequency and attenuate frequencies higher than that cutoff frequency. The transfer function for a first-order low-pass active filter is:
1.3K
Machines01:19

Machines

581
Machines are complex structures consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that work together to transmit forces. One example of a machine is the cutting plier, which is used to cut wires by applying forces to its handles. When equal and opposite forces are exerted on the handles of the cutting plier, they cause the cutting edges to come together and apply equal and opposite reaction forces on the wire, which are greater than the applied forces.
A free-body diagram of the...
581
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.2K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

13.4K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Harmonizing standards and resources for the medical genome.

Nature·2026
Same author

Evolutionary dynamics of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic periods in Houston, Texas, USA.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Structural variant calling using Sniffles2.

Nature protocols·2026
Same author

A complete human pancreatic cancer genome.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Rapid phylogenomic analysis for viral surveillance and metagenomic profiling with Omni2Tree.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A computational model for quantifying instability of tandem repeats across the genome.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.8K

A systematic assessment of machine learning for structural variant filtering.

Archit Kalra1, Luis F Paulin1, Fritz J Sedlazeck1,2,3,4

  • 1Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|February 9, 2026
PubMed
Summary

For structural variant (SV) detection in long-read sequencing, simple Random Forest models offer optimal accuracy and speed. Complex deep learning and foundation models do not significantly improve performance for germline SV filtering.

More Related Videos

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

2.6K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.8K
Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

2.6K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Accurate structural variant (SV) identification from long-read sequencing is challenging.
  • Existing machine learning (ML) methods lack systematic performance comparison.
  • Deep learning and foundation models are increasingly applied to SV analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark diverse ML paradigms for SV filtering.
  • To evaluate classical, deep learning, and foundation models on standardized data.
  • To provide a framework for selecting SV detection methods.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive benchmark of five ML paradigms: Random Forest, computer vision models (ResNet/VICReg), diffusion-based anomaly detection, sparse autoencoders (SAEs) on Evo2-7B, and ensembles.
  • Utilized standardized Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) data for HG002 and HG005 samples.
  • Evaluated models based on accuracy, efficiency, and interpretability.

Main Results:

  • A simple Random Forest classifier achieved a peak F1-score of 95.7%, comparable to complex models like ResNet50 (95.9%) and diffusion models (95.8%).
  • Diffusion models and SAEs showed promise in representation learning and feature interpretability but did not exceed the performance ceiling.
  • Ensemble methods provided no performance advantage in this study.

Conclusions:

  • Simpler, interpretable ML models offer the best balance of accuracy, speed, and transparency for germline SV filtering.
  • Increased model complexity should only be pursued if it addresses unmet biological needs.
  • This benchmark facilitates pragmatic method selection for SV analysis.