Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Cutting Procedures, Tensile Testing, and Ageing of Flexible Unidirectional Composite Laminates
Published on: April 27, 2019
Developing a Round-Robin Module For The Integration Of Consensus Standards In a BME Course Using a Custom Tensile
Chara Nunnally1, Adrian P Defante2, Michael G Browne1
1Richard and Loan Hill Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.
Biomedical engineering students improved their ability to interpret and apply consensus standards using a novel round-robin testing module. This hands-on approach enhanced their understanding of standards development and testing variability for industry readiness.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering Education
- Medical Device Development
- Standards Compliance
Background:
- Proficiency in consensus standards is critical for biomedical engineers in medical device development.
- Existing curricula may not adequately prepare students for the practical application and revision of standards.
- Understanding testing variability and protocol limitations is essential for regulatory compliance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and implement a novel, standards-based learning module for biomedical engineering students.
- To enhance students' ability to interpret, apply, and revise consensus standards.
- To introduce students to the challenges of testing variability and protocol development through hands-on experience.
Main Methods:
- A hands-on module was integrated into an upper-level biomedical engineering course.
- Students used a custom tensile testing device and a mock standard for round-robin testing.
- Deliberate adulterations were introduced to simulate real-world testing challenges.
Main Results:
- Students demonstrated reliable application and revision of the mock standard (LO2, LO3).
- Post-module surveys indicated increased student confidence in applying standards and identifying protocol limitations.
- While students showed some difficulty defining round-robin testing (LO1), overall confidence in industry preparedness improved.
Conclusions:
- The standards-based module effectively engaged students in higher-order problem-solving related to standards implementation.
- The curriculum enhanced understanding of testing variability and collaborative verification processes.
- This model can be expanded to other engineering disciplines to improve workforce preparedness in quality engineering and R&D.
Related Concept Videos
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete
The dimensions and shape of a concrete specimen...
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation
Measurement: Standard Units
Relation Between Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength of Concrete
Integration by Parts: Indefinite Integrals

