Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Differences in Measurement of Glenoid Morphology Between Radiographs and Computed Tomography
Matthew J Orringer1, Benjamin M Lurie1, Cory K Mayfield1
1Keck School of Medicine of USC, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Plain radiographs may overestimate shoulder angles and bony resection depth needed for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This could lead to overresection and implant subsidence. Differences in glenoid inclination may also exist between sexes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Radiology
- Biomedical engineering
Background:
- Preoperative planning and glenoid deformity assessment are crucial for successful reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).
- Shoulder β and RSA angles are valuable metrics for RSA preoperative planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare glenoid markers (β and RSA angles, bony resection depth) between plain radiographs and CT scans.
- To introduce and evaluate the inferior glenoid bony resection depth (BRD) for neutral baseplate placement.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study included 41 patients with both shoulder radiographs and CT scans.
- Measurements of β angle, RSA angle, and BRD were performed using both imaging modalities.
- Subgroup analysis examined differences between male and female patients.
Main Results:
- Plain radiographs showed a greater mean β angle (78.8° vs 76.9°) and average resection depth (7.32 mm vs 5.86 mm) compared to CT scans.
- Men exhibited a higher average β angle (81.6°) than women (75.8°).
Conclusions:
- Plain radiographs may overestimate the shoulder β angle and the required inferior glenoid bony resection.
- Overestimation of resection depth could lead to glenoid overresection and potential implant subsidence.
- Patient sex may influence glenoid inclination, suggesting sex-specific considerations in RSA planning.
More Related Videos
10:24Neutron Radiography and Computed Tomography of Biological Systems at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's High Flux Isotope Reactor
Published on: May 7, 2021
10:21Continuous Blood Sampling in Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Measurement of the Arterial Input Function
Published on: August 8, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Sum and Difference OpAmps
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...