Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Differences in Measurement of Glenoid Morphology Between Radiographs and Computed Tomography
Matthew J Orringer1, Benjamin M Lurie1, Cory K Mayfield1
1Keck School of Medicine of USC, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Background:
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) requires deliberate preoperative planning and evaluation of glenoid deformity. The shoulder β and RSA angles, as described by Mauer and Boileau, respectively, are of value for preoperative planning for RSA.
Purposes:
To evaluate differences in relevant glenoid markers, such as the β and RSA angles, between plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans and to further introduce and evaluate a novel measurement, the inferior glenoid bony resection depth (BRD), which is the resection distance required for placement of a baseplate in 0° of superior inclination.
Study Design:
Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
Patients with both plain radiographs and CT scans of the shoulder performed at the same institution within 3 months were reviewed. The shoulder β and RSA angles and BRD were assessed using radiographs and 2-dimensional CT scans. All radiographic measures were compared based on imaging modality (radiographs vs 2-dimensional CT scan). A subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate differences between male and female patients.
Results:
In total, 41 patients were included. The mean β angle on radiographs was greater than when measured using CT (78.8° vs 76.9°, P = .02). The average resection depth was higher on radiographs as well (7.32 mm vs 5.86 mm, P < .001). Furthermore, men had a higher average β angle than women (81.6° vs 75.8°, P = .001).
Conclusion:
Plain radiographs may overestimate shoulder β angle and inferior glenoid resection. In addition, inferior glenoid resection depth necessary to achieve a neutral baseplate, as measured on both radiograph and CT, would lead to overresection of the glenoid, putting patients at risk for implant subsidence. We further found that there may be differences in glenoid inclination based on patient sex.
More Related Videos
10:24Neutron Radiography and Computed Tomography of Biological Systems at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's High Flux Isotope Reactor
Published on: May 7, 2021
10:21Continuous Blood Sampling in Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Enables the Measurement of the Arterial Input Function
Published on: August 8, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Sum and Difference OpAmps
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...