Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Multifractal Spectrum Analysis for Assessing Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy
Published on: January 10, 2025
CT-based radiomics and intratumoral heterogeneity for predicting benign and malignant lesions in solid pulmonary
Yurui Lv1, Mengwei Zhang1, Yining Song1
1School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
Background:
Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. This study utilized clinical risk factors along with intratumoral radiomics, peritumoral radiomics, and intratumoral subregional features extracted from computed tomography (CT) lung-window images for individual and integrated modeling to classify solid pulmonary nodules and identify the optimal model, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy while minimizing unnecessary invasive procedures.
Methods:
CT images of 230 pathologically confirmed solitary solid pulmonary nodules were retrospectively collected from two hospitals. Among the 167 patients from the first hospital, 20% (n=34) served as the test set, while the remaining 80% (n=133) were used as the training and development set for 5-fold cross-validation, while data from the second hospital (n=63) served as an external test set. Intratumoral and peritumoral regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated on lung window images, and relevant radiomics features were extracted. Multiple machine learning algorithms-including Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Linear Support Vector Classifier (Linear SVC) etc.-were employed to construct predictive models for distinguishing benign from malignant solid pulmonary nodules.
Results:
A triple-feature model (intratumoral, peritumoral, clinical) achieved superior diagnostic performance [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): training 0.932, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.897-0.960; test 0.833, 95% CI: 0.773-0.890; external test 0.741, 95% CI: 0.618-0.864] with high sensitivity/specificity. The intratumoral-peritumoral dual-modality model showed optimal cross-center robustness external test, AUC =0.808 (95% CI: 0.700-0.922). Habitat imaging revealed heterogeneity, AUC =0.750 (95% CI: 0.676-0.825). Decision curve analysis confirmed the triple-model's clinical utility. SHAP identified age, gender, and key radiomics (e.g., gradient_firstorder_Skewness_Intra) as top predictors. Multi-center test confirmed generalizability, positioning this integrated framework as a robust tool to reduce invasive procedures in pulmonary nodule management.
Conclusions:
The multi-combination models developed in this study enhance the diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing benign from malignant solid pulmonary nodules, with the triple-feature model demonstrating the highest diagnostic performance. This approach has the potential to spare patients from unnecessary invasive procedures and strengthen clinical decision-making in the management of pulmonary nodules.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Metallic Solids
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
Structures of Solids
Network Covalent Solids
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Molecular and Ionic Solids
Molecular Solids
Molecular crystalline solids, such as ice, sucrose (table sugar), and iodine, are solids that are composed of neutral molecules as their constituent units. These molecules are held together by weak intermolecular forces such as London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, or hydrogen bonds, which...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

