Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026
Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Improving Delirium Screening and Detection in the Emergency Department (ED): The Implementation and Evaluation of the
Liron Sinvani1,2,3, Alexandra Perrin3,4, Amy G Huebschmann5
1Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Background:
Delirium is missed in over 75% of older adults presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). The study aimed to determine the efficacy of the ED Delirium Detection Program (ED-DDP) to improve delirium detection while evaluating implementation outcomes.
Methods:
The ED-DDP consisted of a train-the-trainer model where delirium champions (DCs) trained ED nurses to perform delirium screening using an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded Brief Confusion Assessment Method (bCAM). The ED-DDP was implemented across 3 diverse EDs using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, consisting of control, implementation, and intervention periods. The RE-AIM (Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework guided outcome assessments. Efficacy was defined as delirium detection between control and intervention periods. Implementation outcomes were assessed via quantitative (surveys, training logs, EHR) and qualitative (semi-structured interviews) methods.
Results:
Across the 3 ED sites, 94.4% (n = 17/18) of DCs completed delirium training and 94.4% scored ≥ 80% on the post-workshop assessment (Implementation/Fidelity). Over 90% (91.1%, n = 195/214) of nurses agreed to receive training by DCs (Adoption); the average score during nurse bCAM spot checks was 73.3% (Implementation-Fidelity). After ED-DDP implementation, the odds of delirium screening were 11.5 times higher (95% CI: [6.0, 22.3], p < 0.001), when adjusting for time and site clustering (Penetration); screening varied from 6% to 80% across the 3 sites (Reach). The proportion of older adult encounters with a positive delirium screen increased from 0% to 2.2% (p = 0.002; Efficacy). Qualitative data revealed that although DCs and nurses thought delirium screening was a priority for patient care quality and safety, competing priorities were a barrier to consistent and accurate screening (Maintenance).
Conclusions:
Although a comprehensive ED delirium training program successfully increased delirium screening, detection remained low. These findings suggest that sustainable delirium detection in the ED requires not only robust training but also deeply embedded workflow solutions and clear post-detection action pathways.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Emerging Adulthood
01:00Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
01:10Detection of Black Holes
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
01:15Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
01:05Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
01:18Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...