Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial carcinoma: a practical framework for patient selection, toxicity
Abdul Rahman Al Armashi1, Jenny Gong1, Pedro Barata1
1Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Introduction:
Managing urothelial carcinoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors requires addressing issues beyond clinical outcomes. Implementation difficulties affect most patients, predictive biomarkers show limited utility, and treatment discontinuation from toxicity remains problematic.
Areas Covered:
This article integrates clinical trials, systematic reviews, health-system evaluations, and guidelines from 2016 to 2025. We detail limitations of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, panel-based tumor mutational burden (TMB), clinic-ready toxicity pathways, immune-appropriate response criteria (iRECIST), pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, post-ICI sequencing (FGFR3 alterations, enfortumab vedotin-based therapy, chemotherapy, trials), and delivery models (navigation, electronic patient-reported outcomes, telemedicine, payment structures).
Expert Opinion:
Optimizing systemic frameworks for immunotherapy care requires careful evaluation of functional status, protocols for immune-related adverse events management, standardization for assessments of clinical responses, and ensuring equitable access to care. ctDNA and AI-assisted radiomics are promising adjuncts to clinical care, but still require multi-center prospective validation before adoption into routine practice.
Insights
Immune checkpoint inhibitors for urothelial carcinoma face implementation challenges, limited biomarkers, and toxicity issues. Optimizing immunotherapy requires better management of adverse events, response assessment, and equitable access to care.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Urothelial Carcinoma
Background:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are crucial for urothelial carcinoma but present significant implementation challenges.
- Limited utility of predictive biomarkers like programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) complicates treatment selection.
- Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity and difficulties in assessing clinical responses remain problematic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview of current challenges and future directions in managing urothelial carcinoma with ICIs.
- To integrate evidence from clinical trials, systematic reviews, and health-system evaluations from 2016 to 2025.
- To offer expert opinions on optimizing immunotherapy care delivery and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of clinical trials, health-system evaluations, and guidelines (2016-2025).
- Analysis of limitations in predictive biomarkers (PD-L1, TMB) and response criteria (iRECIST).
- Evaluation of toxicity management, pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, and post-ICI sequencing strategies.
Main Results:
- Identified limitations in PD-L1 expression and TMB utility.
- Detailed challenges in managing immune-related adverse events and interpreting clinical responses (pseudoprogression, hyperprogression).
- Highlighted the need for improved delivery models, including navigation, patient-reported outcomes, and telemedicine.
Conclusions:
- Optimizing immunotherapy requires robust frameworks for managing adverse events, standardizing response assessments, and ensuring equitable access.
- Emerging technologies like ctDNA and AI-assisted radiomics show promise but need further validation.
- Systemic improvements are essential for effective and accessible urothelial carcinoma treatment with ICIs.
Related Concept Videos
Humoral Immune Responses
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors
Among the PDE5 inhibitors, sildenafil (Revatio) stands out as a competitive and selective inhibitor. It operates by elevating cellular levels of cGMP and augmenting signaling through the cGMP-PKG pathway, promoting vasodilation. Upon oral...
Cell-mediated Immune Responses
Cells of the Adaptive Immune Response
Immune Response Against Viral Pathogens
NK Cells
NK cells are a crucial part of our innate immune system, acting as the first line of defense against viral infections. These cells can recognize and kill infected cells without prior exposure to the virus, effectively slowing down the spread of infection. Additionally, NK cells produce proinflammatory...
Cells of the Innate Immune Response
Phagocytes
Phagocytes police the peripheral tissues by removing cellular debris and responding to the invasion of foreign substances or pathogens. Many phagocytes attack and remove microorganisms even before lymphocytes detect them. The human body has two general...

