Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
Are equity, diversity and inclusion considered in early-phase studies evaluating innovative and developing surgical
Manal Etemadi1,2, Rhiannon Macefield1,2, Kerry Avery1,2
1Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Introduction:
Increased risks and concerns regarding patient safety in early-phase studies exist because knowledge about the new intervention is still accumulating. This means that narrow eligibility criteria are needed. However, if early-phase studies are narrow in their inclusion, for example, by not including diverse populations, there is a potential risk that new therapies have insufficient relevant efficacy and safety data. Existing research has explored equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) factors in early-phase pharmaceutical studies, but it has not been possible to find studies that have systematically examined whether EDI factors have been considered in surgical studies reporting innovative procedures. We aim to examine how EDI factors are considered in early-phase surgical studies and surgical innovation reports to explore how this may impact on later-phase evaluation and inclusive intervention implementation.
Methods And Analysis:
A scoping review following the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) and Arksey and O'Malley's five-step process is being conducted. We will search Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science for surgical early-phase studies. A two-step screening process for eligibility is being used. Independent double screening will take place for 20% of the papers. Eligible articles will report early evaluation of an innovative surgical/invasive procedure. Excluded will be comparative and later-phase studies and early evaluations of pharmaceutical products even in a surgical setting. Data on article details, patient eligibility and whether protected characteristics are reported and considered will be extracted. Information about EDI considerations reported in the introduction or discussion of the papers will also be extracted. Findings will be discussed with a patient advisory group. A content synthesis approach will be undertaken and descriptive summaries presented.
Ethics And Dissemination:
This study does not require ethical approval being a secondary analysis. The findings will be disseminated through academic journal publications and oral presentations.
Related Concept Videos
The Scope of Physics
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Equity Theory
Inclusive Fitness
Cell Inclusions
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...

