Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

13.9K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.9K
Gene-Environment Interactions01:20

Gene-Environment Interactions

1.2K
Gene expression is a dynamic process that is significantly influenced by environmental factors. This interaction underlies the complex nature of biological development and the phenotypic differences observed among individuals, even among those with identical genetic makeups. Factors such as radiation, temperature, behavior, nutrition, and stress play pivotal roles in determining how genes are expressed. The concept of the reaction range is central to understanding this interaction. It posits...
1.2K
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

7.7K
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
7.7K
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment01:25

Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment

2.0K
Transmission-based precautions are for patients infected or suspected to be infected (or colonized) with organisms posing a significant risk to others. The transmission precautions include airborne and protective environment precautions.
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
2.0K
Biodiversity and Human Values01:24

Biodiversity and Human Values

17.1K
Human civilization relies on biodiversity in many ways. Sudden changes in species biodiversity result in environmental changes that can modify weather patterns and therefore human civilizations.
17.1K
Empathy02:34

Empathy

10.1K
Some researchers suggest that altruism operates on empathy. Empathy is the capacity to understand another person’s perspective, to feel what he or she feels. An empathetic person makes an emotional connection with others and feels compelled to help (Batson, 1991). Empathy can be expressed in several ways, including cognitive, affective, and motor. 
10.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interpretable abstractions of artificial neural networks predict behavior and neural activity during human information gathering.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

Stochastic choice drives variability in patch foraging decisions in humans and rats.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Brain activity, disruption and connectivity comparisons identify origins of human metacognition in other primates.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

The social dimension of apathy: evidence for a distinct domain from 11,243 individuals across health and neurocognitive disorders.

Translational psychiatry·2026
Same author

Central Questions for Social Neuroscience Research.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Activity in human dorsal raphe nucleus signals changes in behavioural policy.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Plasmonic nanocomposite helices for weather-adaptive LiDAR function.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Multidirectional strain-insensitive stretchable RF electronics.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

In-scanner thoughts contribute to resting-state functional connectivity.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Metal-center electron affinity modulates multicolor electrochromism in 2D conjugated metal-organic frameworks.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Hyperbranched dielectric polymer networks exhibiting giant energy storage density at 250 °C.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

3D nanoprinting of metals by spatiotemporally confined hot electrons via multiple-electron excitations in nanocrystals.

Nature communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Proteomic Analysis of Human Macrophage Polarization Under a Low Oxygen Environment
10:15

Proteomic Analysis of Human Macrophage Polarization Under a Low Oxygen Environment

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.5K

Humans are more prosocial in poor foraging environments.

Todd A Vogel1,2,3, Luke Priestley4, Jo Cutler5,6,7

  • 1Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. t.vogel@bham.ac.uk.

Nature Communications
|February 9, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Environmental factors significantly influence prosocial behavior. People are more likely to help others in low-reward environments, demonstrating that the context of opportunities shapes altruistic decisions.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.4K
A Single-fly Assay for Foraging Behavior in Drosophila
13:01

A Single-fly Assay for Foraging Behavior in Drosophila

Published on: November 4, 2013

13.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Proteomic Analysis of Human Macrophage Polarization Under a Low Oxygen Environment
10:15

Proteomic Analysis of Human Macrophage Polarization Under a Low Oxygen Environment

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.5K
Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.4K
A Single-fly Assay for Foraging Behavior in Drosophila
13:01

A Single-fly Assay for Foraging Behavior in Drosophila

Published on: November 4, 2013

13.8K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Environmental Psychology

Background:

  • Prosocial behaviors are crucial for societal well-being and addressing global issues.
  • Traditional measures often use simplified economic games, not reflecting real-world complexity.
  • Everyday decisions involve navigating competing opportunities with varying rewards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how environmental context influences prosocial decision-making.
  • To examine the role of opportunity cost in prosocial behavior across different environments.
  • To understand the factors driving decisions to help others.

Main Methods:

  • Three independent studies with a total of 510 participants.
  • Participants encountered opportunities to benefit themselves or others while watching a movie.
  • Decisions were analyzed across varying 'poor' and 'rich' foraging environments with different reward values.

Main Results:

  • Environmental quality significantly impacts prosocial behavior.
  • Participants were more willing to help others in low-reward ('poor') environments.
  • Computational modeling indicated distinct valuations of opportunity costs for others, influenced by utilitarianism and empathy.

Conclusions:

  • The decision to engage in prosocial behavior is context-dependent, influenced by environmental opportunity quality.
  • Environmental changes critically affect the likelihood of individuals acting prosocially.
  • Understanding environmental influences is key to promoting prosociality in a changing world.