Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Method and Instrumented Fixture for Femoral Fracture Testing in a Sideways Fall-on-the-Hip Position
Published on: August 17, 2017
Gluteus maximus cross-sectional area/density in 1-year mortality prediction for oldest-old hip fracture patients
Mingyuan Song1,2,3,4,5, Tian Xie1,2,3,4,5, Renwang Sheng1,2,3,4,5
1Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, PR China.
Background:
Sarcopenia is a prevalent issue among older patients with hip fracture and is a risk factor for poor clinical outcomes. Computed tomography (CT)-derived muscle density and areawere reported to predict the prognosis of fracture patients. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of these CT-based muscle parameters in predicting 1-year mortality in the oldest-old patients with hip fracture (≥ 80 years).
Methods:
A retrospective study was conducted on 324 hip fracture patients aged ≥ 80 years from 2018 to 2022. The cross-sectional area (CSA) and Hounsfield units (HU) of periarticular hip muscles were measured from CT images. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed, and its performance was assessed using ROC analysis, calibration curves, and Hosmer-Lemeshow testing. A nomogram was developed for model visualization and early clinical application.
Results:
The 1-year mortality rate in this cohort was 13.0% (42/324). Survivors and non-survivors significantly differed in age, red blood cells (RBC), platelets, albumin, urea, and gluteal muscle parameters (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified four mortality predictors: older age (P = 0.048), lower albumin (P = 0.025), reduced gluteal density (P = 0.031), and smaller muscle area (P = 0.045). Gluteus maximus density and area independently predicted 1-year mortality (P < 0.05) in oldest-old hip fracture patients. Our predictive model incorporating age, muscle density, albumin, and muscle area showed a moderate predictive value (AUC = 0.741).
Conclusion:
This CT-based method offers a practical alternative to traditional sarcopenia assessments, facilitating early risk identification in this hip fracture population.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN2
With increased substitution on the alkyl halide,...
Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area
Profile Leveling and Cross Sections
Spinal Cord: Cross-sectional Anatomy
Gray Matter and its Components
Central to the gray matter is...
Crossing Over
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process...

