Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Development and 2025 re-evaluation of a Japanese quality indicator set for adult intensive care: a modified RAND/UCLA
Junji Kumasawa1,2, Hiroshi Okamoto3, Takaki Naito4
1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sakai City Medical Cente, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan. jkumakumakuma@hotmail.com.
A 2025 re-evaluation updated Japan's intensive care unit (ICU) quality indicators (QIs), ensuring relevance for continuous quality improvement and national benchmarking in adult ICUs.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Established a comprehensive, evidence-based set of quality indicators (QIs) for adult intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan.
- Recognized the need for periodic updates to QIs due to evolving evidence and practice in critical care.
- Initiated a formal re-evaluation in 2025 to confirm the validity and update the core Japanese ICU QI set developed in 2017-2018.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and update a feasible, contextually adapted set of quality indicators for Japanese intensive care units.
- To confirm the current validity and relevance of existing ICU quality indicators.
- To establish a foundation for national benchmarking and continuous quality improvement in Japanese ICUs.
Main Methods:
- Employed a modified RAND/UCLA appropriateness method involving a multidisciplinary expert panel.
- Conducted systematic literature reviews and analyzed major clinical guidelines to generate candidate quality indicators.
- Utilized a three-round rating and consensus process, including face-to-face meetings, to refine and finalize the quality indicator set.
Main Results:
- An initial set of 44 candidate quality indicators was identified.
- The 2018 consensus process resulted in a set of 38 quality indicators (13 structure, 10 process, 15 outcome).
- The 2025 re-evaluation confirmed 37 indicators as appropriate, reclassified one as uncertain, and added one new appropriate indicator, maintaining a core set of 38 indicators.
Conclusions:
- A rigorous methodology was used to develop and update a feasible and contextually relevant Japanese ICU QI set.
- The updated core set of 38 quality indicators provides a robust foundation for quality improvement initiatives.
- The finalized quality indicators are deemed appropriate and relevant for the Japanese ICU setting, supporting national benchmarking.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Indicators
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

