Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Separation of Immune Cell Subpopulations in Peripheral Blood Samples from Children with Infectious Mononucleosis
Published on: September 7, 2022
False-positive infectious screening results among blood donors
Sofie Dolores Holm Müller1, Mie Topholm Bruun1,2, Jørgen Georgsen1,2
1Clinical Immunology Research Unit, Department of Clinical Immunology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Background And Objectives:
High-sensitivity assays for infectious screening of blood donations still occasionally result in false-positive test results (FPTRs). The cause of FPTRs is not always clear and may stem from both lot-dependent and lot-independent factors. FPTRs generate additional administration and extra costs for confirmatory testing and may cause concern among deferred donors.
Materials And Methods:
First-time and second-time FPTRs among blood donors screened from January 2021 to November 2023 were identified in the blood bank computer system. Abbott Alinity i hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody/antigen assays and Roche Cobas MPX assay were used for screening. Using logistic regression, we examined whether the risk of second-time FPTR was affected by being a new donor, sex, age and time between two donations.
Results:
During the study period, 38,962 donors gave 223,323 donations. The total number of FPTRs was 216. Among the donors with a first-time FPTR, 83 had a second donation within the observation period, and 56 (67.5%) of these had a second-time FPTR. In total, 0.2% of donors were deferred because of second-time FPTR. New donors with a first-time FPTR had a significantly higher risk (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.17-31.55]) of a second-time FPTR, which occurred in 89.5% of cases.
Conclusion:
An increased risk of second-time FPTR was found among new donors, and hence it may be beneficial considering the donors' ethical and economical aspects, to defer this group of donors after the initial FPTR. Lot-independent factors might explain why some donors keep getting FPTR even after years.
Insights
New blood donors with a false-positive test result (FPTR) have a significantly higher risk of experiencing a second FPTR. This finding suggests potential benefits in deferring new donors after an initial FPTR to reduce costs and donor concern.
Area of Science:
- Transfusion Medicine
- Clinical Laboratory Science
- Immunology
Background:
- High-sensitivity assays for blood donation screening can yield false-positive test results (FPTRs).
- The causes of FPTRs are multifactorial, including lot-dependent and lot-independent factors.
- FPTRs incur administrative costs, necessitate confirmatory testing, and can cause anxiety for deferred donors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the risk factors associated with repeat false-positive test results (FPTRs) in blood donors.
- To determine if donor characteristics influence the likelihood of a second FPTR.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of blood donor screening data from January 2021 to November 2023.
- Identification of first-time and second-time FPTRs using Abbott Alinity i and Roche Cobas MPX assays.
- Logistic regression analysis to assess the impact of donor status (new vs. repeat), sex, age, and interval between donations on the risk of a second FPTR.
Main Results:
- Out of 223,323 donations from 38,962 donors, 216 FPTRs were recorded.
- Among 83 donors with a first-time FPTR who donated again, 67.5% had a second FPTR.
- New donors with an initial FPTR had a significantly higher risk (aOR=6.06) of a second FPTR, occurring in 89.5% of such cases.
Conclusions:
- New blood donors experiencing an initial FPTR demonstrate a substantially elevated risk of a subsequent FPTR.
- Deferring new donors after a first FPTR may be advisable from ethical and economic perspectives.
- Persistent FPTRs in some donors, even over extended periods, suggest the influence of lot-independent factors.
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Position-effect Variegation
Position and Displacement
Serial Position Effect
Position Vectors
For instance, we want to locate a point P(x, y, z) relative to the origin of coordinates O. In that case, we can define a position...
Anatomical Positions
The body is upright, facing forward, and standing erect.
The feet are parallel and flat on the floor.
The arms are hanging by the...

