Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Transduction-Transplantation Mouse Model of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Published on: December 22, 2016
Predicting modelling for early diagnosis in early myeloproliferative neoplasms, not otherwise specified. Evidence
Anna Scattone1, Andrea Lupo2, Concetta Saponaro1
1Pathology Department, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.
Background:
Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has become a valuable tool for diagnosing and predicting outcomes in blood disorders. Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) of bone marrow biopsies (BMBs) offers detailed, high-resolution views of cells and tissues; its adoption may improve the resources dedicated to the interpretation of BMB with suspected early myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).
Methods:
We collected a retrospective dataset of H&E-stained BMBs from 88 patients diagnosed with MPN, divided into three groups: 19 with prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF), 30 with polycythemia vera (PV), and 39 with essential thrombocythemia (ET). Using AI, we framed this as a three-class classification problem. For each whole slide image, we automatically calculated cellularity and cell density. We extracted morphological features related to megakaryocytes-area, perimeter, and circularity-and summarized them for each patient using statistics like mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy. This resulted in 17 features combining nuclear morphology, cell density statistics, and cellularity. After selecting significant features with the Kruskal-Wallis test, we trained a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier with 5-fold cross-validation to predict MPN subtypes. We then tested the model on 13 patients with a diagnosis of MPN not otherwise specified (MPN-NOS) to assess its capacity to correctly characterize the diagnosis.
Results:
The model achieved a mean multiclass Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.70 ± 0.01 and an accuracy of 0.60 ± 0.03. When tested on the 13 patients with MPN not otherwise specified (MPN-NOS), the model agreed with pathologists' biopsy classifications 61.5% of the time and with clinical follow-up evaluations 50% of the time.
Conclusions:
This study represents a first step toward the development of automated tools to support MPN diagnosis, providing potential assistance to haematologists and pathologists in the clinical management of patients.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
07:15Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
Simplified Synchronous Machine Model
In this model, each generator is connected to a...
Wind Turbine Machine Models
Induction machines interact through the rotating magnetic field generated by the stator and the rotor. The key parameter is slip, which is the difference between synchronous speed and rotor speed relative to synchronous speed. Slip is...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Machines
A free-body diagram of the...
Machines: Problem Solving II