Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Studying Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling by Aortic Debanding in Rodents
Published on: July 14, 2021
Do Early Aortic Remodelling Patterns at 6 Months Predict Mid-Term Outcomes After Frozen Elephant Trunk for Chronic
Sho Akita1,2, Yoshiyuki Tokuda1, Akinori Tamenishi2
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8560, Japan.
Computed tomography (CT) after frozen elephant trunk (FET) repair for aortic dissection predicts outcomes. Early negative remodeling (ENR) on 6-month CT indicates a high-risk group needing closer surveillance and timely intervention.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Aortic Surgery
Background:
- Chronic aortic dissection poses significant risks, often requiring complex surgical repair.
- Total arch replacement with a frozen elephant trunk (FET) is a key intervention for extensive aortic disease.
- Predicting mid-term outcomes after FET repair is crucial for guiding further management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive value of 6-month postoperative computed tomography (CT) after FET repair for chronic aortic dissection.
- To determine if early aortic remodeling on CT can stratify risk and inform the timing of distal interventions.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 56 patients undergoing total arch replacement with FET, with 6-month postoperative CT scans.
- Definition of early positive remodeling (EPR) and early negative remodeling (ENR) based on proximal descending thoracic aorta diameter changes.
- Assessment of outcomes including distal reintervention, stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE), and overall survival.
Main Results:
- Patients with ENR showed significantly higher rates of distal reintervention (6.2% vs 44.6% freedom from reintervention) and dSINE (18.2% vs 65.1% dSINE-free survival) at 5 years compared to EPR.
- Overall 5-year survival was 80.0% for the cohort.
- In the ENR group, 5-year survival was 0% with conservative management versus 40.5% with distal intervention, while in the EPR group, survival was 65.9% with conservative management vs 85.7% with reintervention.
Conclusions:
- Six-month CT imaging after FET repair provides a simple and actionable method for risk stratification in chronic aortic dissection.
- The absence of early positive remodeling (ENR) identifies a high-risk subgroup requiring intensified surveillance and prompt distal treatment.
- This imaging-based risk assessment can optimize follow-up intensity and the timing of subsequent interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Nucleosome Remodeling
Nucleosome remodeling complex
Eukaryotic cells have specialized enzymes called ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling enzymes. These enzymes...
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

