Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatic Fibrosis Diagnosis Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography and AI
Published on: July 21, 2023
Comparison of Virtual MR Elastography Based on Intravoxel Incoherent Motion With MR Elastography in the Assessment of
Yijing Luo1,2, Bocheng Zou1,2, Xiaohuan Mei1,2
1Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Background:
Intratumoral fibrosis influences treatment efficacy and prognosis of rectal cancer (RC). The roles of MR elastography (MRE) and Virtual MRE (VMRE) remain unclear in assessing it in RC.
Purpose:
To evaluate MRE for assessing intratumoral fibrosis in RC, identify optimal b-values for VMRE, and compare their diagnostic performance.
Study Type:
Prospective cohort.
Population:
A total of 71 participants with pathologically confirmed RC (47 men; mean age, 62 ± 10 years).
Field Strength/Sequences:
3T, T2-weighted turbo-spin echo, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo, Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) (b = 0, 100, 200, 1000, 1500 s/mm2), and spin-echo MRE.
Assessment:
All participants were divided at a 7:3 ratio: subgroup 1 (N = 49) determined the optimal b-value combination and established the empirical relationship between shifted apparent diffusion coefficient (sADC) and VMRE (Vc, Vφ) based on IVIM, with MRE (c, φ) as reference; subgroup 2 (N = 22) validated this relationship. MRE and VMRE evaluated intratumoral fibrosis in 43 surgically diagnosed participants.
Statistical Tests:
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), Pearson correlation, DeLong test. Bonferroni-adjusted p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Results:
The optimal combination of b-values was 0 and 1500 s/mm2 (r c = -0.808, r φ = -0.644) for VMRE in subgroup 1. In 43 surgically diagnosed participants, area under curves (AUCs) of c and φ for assessing intratumoral fibrosis were 0.779 and 0.684, respectively (Adjusted p = 0.828). AUCs of Vc and Vφ converted from sADC0-1500 values were 0.792 and 0.784, respectively (Adjusted p > 0.999). No significant differences in AUCs were observed among all parameters (Adjusted p: 0.384 to > 0.999). Sensitivity and specificity ranges of MRE and VMRE were 85.7%-90.5% and 54.5%-68.2%, respectively.
Data Conclusions:
MRE was used to evaluate intratumoral fibrosis in RC. The optimal b-values combination for VMRE in RC was 0 s/mm2 and 1500 s/mm2. No significant difference was observed for assessing intratumoral fibrosis between MRE and VMRE.
Evidence Level:
2.
Technical Efficacy:
Stage 2.
More Related Videos
05:56Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
12:18Magnetic Resonance Elastography Methodology for the Evaluation of Tissue Engineered Construct Growth
Published on: February 9, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Body Temperature - Rectal
Follow these steps for rectal temperature assessment:
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don clean gloves to prevent cross-infection.
Step 2: Position the patient in a side-lying position to better visualize the rectal...
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Virtual Work
In static equilibrium, a body can experience an imaginary or virtual movement, such as displacement or rotation. The virtual work done by a force is equal to the dot product of force and virtual displacement in the direction of the force. When it comes to virtually rotating a...
Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids
Cystic Fibrosis: Pathogenesis
CF is primarily caused by a genetic mutation in a chromosome 7 gene coding for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. The most common gene mutation leading to CF is the ΔF508 mutation,...
Equation of Motion: General Plane motion
Moreover, the body's center of mass experiences a rotational effect as a result of these couple moments. This rotation can be articulated as the...