Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 12, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Defining Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Tasks in Health Data Research: A Consensus Study
Hayley G Evans1, Olivia C Robinson2, Linda von Nerée1
1NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Data Driven Transfusion Practice, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Background:
Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is essential throughout the research cycle, but a one-size-fits-all approach does not suit all study types. Health data research presents several unique challenges, including ensuring data transparency and security. Thus, PPIE guidance should ideally define specific tasks to reduce the likelihood of tokenistic involvement. We therefore aimed to develop actionable, task-focused guidance for PPIE in health data research.
Methods:
We used a consensus development process. We generated a list of potential PPIE tasks in health data research from existing literature informed by discussion with expert witnesses. We convened a consensus panel of nine members, comprising PPIE participants with varying experiences of PPIE and data research, PPIE professionals and health researchers. The panel first rated their agreement with tasks independently online and then discussed disagreements during an in-person meeting, after which all tasks were re-rated. We calculated median scores and refined a final set of tasks.
Results:
We identified 29 tasks across six domains of the research cycle: (1) prioritising and commissioning research; (2) planning research projects; (3) delivering research; (4) interpreting research; (5) sharing and using research knowledge; and (6) evaluating research. Consensus was reached on 25 tasks in the first round. Initial disagreements, particularly around planning research projects and monitoring data privacy, were resolved following structured discussions. Consensus and support were achieved for all 29 tasks following the second round.
Conclusions:
PPIE participants expressed a strong desire to be involved in all aspects of the research cycle. We offer a framework of actionable PPIE tasks for health data research and invite further development and evaluation.
Patient And Public Contributions:
PPIE participants were involved shaping the project idea and design, draughting a list of PPIE tasks, rating and discussing the importance of PPIE tasks and co-writing the publication.
More Related Videos
10:43Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes
Published on: June 10, 2021
09:20Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications
Published on: February 23, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Data Reporting and Recording
Defining Psychology
Piecewise-Defined Functions
Defining Social Psychology
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Antigens Involved in Adaptive Immunity
Complete Antigens
Complete antigens possess both immunogenicity and...