Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

09:51
Enhanced Genome Editing with Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Diverse Cells and Organisms
Published on: May 25, 2018
35.9K
Evolution of Prime Editing: Enhancing Efficiency and Expanding Capacity
Jihyeon Yu1, Ju-Chan Park2,3, Heesoo Uhm2
1School of Biomedical Convergence Engineering, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
Advanced Science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)
|February 11, 2026
Summary
Prime editing (PE) offers precise genome editing for rare diseases, enabling targeted mutations. Ongoing research aims to enhance PE efficiency and expand its capabilities for broader clinical applications.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Genetic mutations are responsible for approximately 80% of rare human diseases, underscoring the need for advanced genome editing tools.
- The evolution of genome editing technologies, from CRISPR-Cas9 to base editors and prime editing (PE), has rapidly advanced since 2012.
- Prime editing (PE) enables precise DNA modifications, including insertions, deletions, and point mutations, without requiring double-strand breaks, showing promise for clinical applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current advancements in prime editing (PE) technology.
- To highlight ongoing research focused on improving PE efficiency and expanding its capabilities.
- To discuss future directions for PE tool development in genome editing.
Main Methods:
- Review of scientific literature on prime editing (PE) technology.
- Analysis of research efforts to enhance PE efficiency and versatility.
- Exploration of strategies to overcome PE limitations for clinical applications.
Main Results:
- Prime editing (PE) offers enhanced precision and versatility for genome editing compared to earlier technologies.
- Current research is actively addressing limitations such as low editing efficiency and restricted large-scale manipulation capacity in PE.
- Significant progress has been made in developing improved PE systems and expanding their functional scope.
Conclusions:
- Prime editing (PE) is a powerful and versatile genome editing tool with significant potential for treating rare genetic diseases.
- Continued innovation is crucial to overcome existing limitations and fully realize the clinical utility of PE.
- Future research will focus on optimizing PE efficiency, broadening its editing capacity, and ensuring its safety and efficacy for therapeutic applications.
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
48.4K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
48.4K
Convergent Evolution
33.1K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
33.1K
Lung Capacity
56.4K
The air in the lungs is measured in volumes and capacities. Lung volume measures reflect the amount of air taken in, released, or left over after a lung function, like a single inhalation. Lung capacity measures are sums of two or more lung volume measures.
56.4K
RNA Editing
9.9K
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification where a precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) nucleotide sequence is changed by base insertion, deletion, or modification. The extent of RNA editing varies from a few hundred bases, in mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes, to a just single base, in nuclear genes of mammals. Even a single base change in the pre-mRNA can convert a codon for one amino acid into the codon for another amino acid or a stop codon. This type of re-coding can significantly affect the...
9.9K
Eukaryotic Evolution
42.4K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
42.4K
Synteny and Evolution
3.8K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.8K

