Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Did Not Exacerbate Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease Activity in Patients With Cancer
Ping-Han Tsai1,2,3, Chen-I Hsieh1,2,3, Yung-Chia Kuo4,5,6
11Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei City Municipal Tucheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Background:
The safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with cancer and preexisting or acquired autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of ICIs in patients with cancer and preexisting or acquired ARDs using a relatively large real-world database.
Patients And Methods:
Using the Chang Gung Research Database, we identified 23,981 patients with cancer who received either ICIs or other systemic anticancer treatments between January 1, 2002, and March 31, 2022. After propensity-score matching at a 1:2:4 ratio based on age, sex, and cancer type, we established 3 groups for analysis: group 1 (patients with both cancer and ARDs who received ICI therapy [Cancer+ICI+ARD+]; n=303), group 2 (patients with cancer without ARDs who received ICI therapy [Cancer+ICI+ARD-]; n=597), and group 3 (patients with cancer with ARDs who received systemic anticancer therapy without ICIs [Cancer+ICI-ARD+]; n=1,212). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar's test were used to assess changes in steroid and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) dosages, as well as laboratory parameters associated with ARD activity, before and after ICIs.
Results:
The study found no significant differences between patients with cancer treated with ICIs who did or did not have ARDs, particularly with respect to steroid dosage. DMARD dosages did not increase after ICI treatment, regardless of ARD status. Laboratory parameters related to ARD activity also showed no significant changes before and after ICI therapy. Notably, immune-related adverse events-aside from an increased incidence of skin complications such as psoriasis (2.31% in group 1 vs 0.41% in group 3; P<.01)-did not result in a higher number of severe or de novo ARDs (7.26% in group 1 vs 10.64% in group 3; P=.08).
Conclusions:
The findings suggest that ICI treatment does not significantly increase the risk of ARD flare-ups in patients with cancer and preexisting or acquired ARDs.
More Related Videos
09:38Determining Immune System Suppression versus CNS Protection for Pharmacological Interventions in Autoimmune Demyelination
Published on: September 12, 2016
04:53Author Spotlight: Traditional Chinese Medicine for Sleep Disorders in Acute COPD — A Safe, Cost-Effective Approach
Published on: October 18, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Active versus Passive Immunity
Active Immunity
Active immunity refers to the resistance one develops...
The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Many proteins function together to control the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mutations affecting these proteins may allow cells to proceed into anaphase prematurely, resulting in the...
