Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Generation of Tumor Organoids from Genetically Engineered Mouse Models of Prostate Cancer
Published on: June 13, 2019
Geographic Variability in Germline Genetic Testing for Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Medicare Claims Study With
Stephan M Korn1,2, Zhiyu Qian1,3, Hanna Zurl1,4
11Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Background:
Germline genetic testing is recommended for patients with prostate cancer, both localized and advanced, based on disease and family history criteria, with results that may inform targeted therapy. However, real-world utilization of germline genetic testing and potential disparities in access remain inadequately characterized. We analyzed germline genetic testing utilization in a national cohort of Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer, examining geographic variation and factors associated with testing.
Methods:
Using nationwide Medicare claims (2019-2023), we identified patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and germline genetic testing claims. Patient-level geographic patterns of testing rates were evaluated using Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (metropolitan, urban, rural) and hospital referral regions. Using multivariable logistic regression, we assessed associations between residence type and germline genetic testing receipt, adjusted for sociodemographic covariates. The SEER database was used to estimate the proportion of patients meeting clinicopathologic criteria for testing.
Results:
Among 749,202 men with prostate cancer, 17,821 (2.38%) underwent germline genetic testing. Based on SEER data, 36.5% of patients would have met clinicopathologic criteria for testing. Across 306 hospital referral regions, testing rates ranged from 0.29% to 14.1%. Urban residents were less likely to undergo germline genetic testing than metropolitan residents (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95). Increasing age (≥81 years: OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.50-0.58) and Asian ethnicity (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.82) were associated with a lower odds of germline genetic testing.
Conclusions:
This study reveals substantial underutilization of germline genetic testing among Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer. Despite evidence supporting its use and benefits, <3% of patients underwent testing, even though more than one-third met established criteria. These findings underscore the need to improve regional access to testing and increase awareness among patients and physicians, particularly for older and Asian populations.
Related Concept Videos
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
The Evidence for Evolution
Selected Data About Geographic Locations

