Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock
Anthony Elhadad1, Omar El Zouhayri1, Johanne Silvain1
1Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris, France.
Insights
Intravenous (IV) antiplatelet therapy in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) patients reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) risk. This potent therapy did not increase major bleeding complications at 30 days.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) necessitates potent antiplatelet therapy.
- Balancing efficacy and bleeding risk is crucial in AMI-CS management.
- Limited data exist on the safety and effectiveness of intravenous (IV) antiplatelet therapy in this high-risk population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IV antiplatelet therapy in patients with AMI-CS.
- To assess the association between IV antiplatelet strategy and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days.
- To determine if IV antiplatelet therapy increases major bleeding risk in AMI-CS patients.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the ACTION-SHOCK cohort (2012-2023) including patients hospitalized with AMI-CS.
- Defined IV antiplatelet therapy as administration of cangrelor or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.
- Employed an inverse probability weighting approach to analyze associations between IV strategy and 30-day MACE and major bleeding outcomes.
Main Results:
- Among 389 AMI-CS patients, 139 (35.7%) received IV antiplatelet therapy.
- IV strategy was linked to a lower risk of 30-day MACE (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41-0.84).
- No significant increase in major bleeding was observed with IV therapy (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.54-1.13).
Conclusions:
- In AMI-CS patients undergoing angiography, IV antiplatelet therapy is associated with reduced ischemic risk.
- The use of IV antiplatelet therapy in AMI-CS did not lead to an increased risk of major bleeding at 30 days.
- Findings were consistent across ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction subtypes.
Background:
Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) requires potent antiplatelet therapy while minimizing bleeding complications. Despite the increased use of intravenous (IV) antiplatelet therapy in this setting, data regarding its use remain limited.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IV antiplatelet therapy in patients with AMI-CS.
Methods:
Using the ACTION-SHOCK cohort, patients hospitalized between 2012 and 2023 with AMI-CS were included. IV antiplatelet therapy was defined as the administration of cangrelor or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Using an inverse probability weighting approach, the associations between IV antiplatelet strategy and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as well as major bleeding at 30 days were assessed. MACE were defined as a composite of all-cause death, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis.
Results:
Among 389 patients with AMI-CS admitted to the catheterization laboratory within 24 hours of admission, 139 (35.7%) received IV antiplatelet therapy. The IV strategy was associated with a lower risk for MACE at 30 days (29.1% [41 of 139] [95% CI: 21.7%-38.5%] vs 44.9% [112 of 250] [95% CI: 38.8%-51.6%]; inverse probability weighting HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41-0.84) without an increase in major bleeding (33.9% [42 of 139] [95% CI: 25.5%-44.1%] vs 42.1% [85 of 250] [95% CI: 35.4%-49.5%]; HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.54-1.13). These results were consistent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions, with persistent MACE reduction and no increase in bleeding, compared with those with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (P for interaction = 0.42 and 0.52).
Conclusions:
In AMI-CS patients undergoing angiography, IV antiplatelet therapy was associated with a lower ischemic risk without an increase in major bleeding at 30 days.
Related Concept Videos
Survey Safety
Shock Waves
When the source's speed approaches the speed of sound, constructive interference between successive wavefronts emitted by the source occurs immediately behind it. Initially, scientists believed that this constructive interference would result in such high...
Self-Efficacy
Household Wiring And Electrical Safety
Gene Therapy
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...

