Plaque-RADS and Neovascularization for Risk Stratification of Carotid Stenosis: A Bimodal Imaging Study
Huan Zhu1,2, Qihang Zhang1,2, Tong Liu1,2
1From the Beijing Neurosurgical Institute (H.Z., Qihang Z., T.L., C.Z., T. Yang., T. Yu., X.L., Qian Z., J.Z., Y.Z.), Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Background And Purpose:
The Carotid Plaque Reporting and Data System (Plaque-RADS) score is a comprehensive imaging-based framework for assessing carotid plaque vulnerability. Intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) is closely linked to atherosclerotic plaque progression. However, the interrelationship between Plaque-RADS and IPN and their respective roles in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis remains incompletely understood.
Materials And Methods:
We retrospectively enrolled 128 patients with unilateral carotid artery stenosis who underwent carotid MR vessel wall imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for integrated plaque characterization. Logistic regression was used to construct predictive models. Model performance was evaluated via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with DeLong test for comparisons; the Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) were calculated to assess incremental predictive value.
Results:
Patients with symptomatic stenosis had significantly higher Plaque-RADS scores (P = .001), IPN grades (P = .002), and plaque volumes (P = .011) than those with remote symptomatic stenosis or asymptomatic stenosis. Both the Plaque-RADS score and IPN grade showed significant inverse correlations with duration since symptom onset (Plaque-RADS: ρ = -0.296, P = .003; IPN: ρ = -0.282, P = .001). We constructed 5 predictive models: 3 single-indicator models (Plaque-RADS only, IPN only, and plaque volume only), a combined model (Plaque-RADS and IPN), and a comprehensive model incorporating Plaque-RADS, IPN, and plaque volume. The combined model achieved an AUC of 0.751 (95% CI, 0.661-0.841), significantly outperforming single-indicator models (plaque volume: 0.644, P = .021; Plaque-RADS only: 0.684, P = .042; IPN only: 0.688, P = .038) but comparable with the comprehensive model (0.770; P = .247). The NRI and IDI of the combined model showed significant incremental value over single-indicator models (all. P < .05) but no significant improvement compared with the comprehensive model (both P = .218).
Conclusions:
Plaque-RADS and the IPN grade are independent and complementary imaging biomarkers for identifying recent cerebrovascular events.
More Related Videos
04:30A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
09:43In vivo Near Infrared Fluorescence NIRF Intravascular Molecular Imaging of Inflammatory Plaque, a Multimodal Approach to Imaging of Atherosclerosis
Published on: August 4, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
