Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Retrospective Comparison of Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Reduced Ejection
James A Brown1, Eishan Ashwat1, Sarah Yousef1
1Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Objective:
To determine the impact of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and reduced ejection fraction (EF).
Design:
A propensity-matched, retrospective study of consecutive aortic valve interventions from 2010 to 2023.
Setting:
A single institution.
Participants:
Patients with severe AS and reduced EF (<50%) undergoing aortic valve intervention.
Interventions:
The cohort was dichotomized by SAVR versus TAVR.
Measurements And Main Results:
A total of 1,164 patients underwent an aortic valve intervention for severe AS with reduced EF (<50%), of which 240 (20.6%) had an isolated SAVR and 924 (79.4%) underwent a TAVR. Propensity matching yielded 205 pairs. The 30-day mortality and stroke rates were no different across groups. Paravalvular leak was significantly higher in the TAVR group, and there was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward more pacemakers in the TAVR group (p = 0.093). At 1 year, EF was similar between groups: 48% (IQR: 41-53) in the SAVR group versus 53% (IQR: 37-58) in the TAVR group (p = 0.431). Conversely, at 1 year, mean pressure gradients were higher in the TAVR group (10 [7-15] mmHg v 8 [7-10] mmHg, p = 0.040). The cumulative incidence of heart failure readmissions was higher in the TAVR group, although it was a statistically nonsignificant trend (p = 0.066). The cumulative incidence of aortic valve reintervention was similar across groups (p = 0.564). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were significantly lower in the TAVR group (p = 0.016).
Conclusions:
While surgery may optimize survival after aortic valve replacement in patients with reduced EF, these observational findings need to be verified by prospective randomized controlled comparisons.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
What is Natural Selection?
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Conservation of Small Populations

