Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

429
A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
429
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

5.0K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
5.0K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

10.9K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.9K
Multiple Allele Traits01:49

Multiple Allele Traits

38.2K
The Concept of Multiple Allelism
38.2K
Base Excision Repair01:54

Base Excision Repair

26.4K
One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
26.4K
Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

4.0K
Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contralateral Breast Background Parenchymal Enhancement: A Physiologic Marker, not a Predictor of ER Status.

Current medical imaging·2026
Same author

Factors affecting access to and utilisation of intravenous iron to treat anaemia in pregnancy in Zomba, Malawi: a qualitative study.

BMJ global health·2026
Same author

The need to strengthen Australian health and social policy to support survivors of the Stolen Generations.

BMJ global health·2026
Same author

Timeliness of Care and Treatment Patterns for Pancreatic Cancer in Victoria, Australia: Comparison With Optimal Care Pathways Targets.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

How Survivors of Colorectal Cancer Experience ctDNA Testing and Fear of Recurrence.

Psycho-oncology·2026
Same author

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current and Novel Approaches in the Management of Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause with fractional COâ‚‚ laser versus fractional microablative radiofrequency: study protocol for a double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

Trials·2026
Same journal

TaILOR: a randomised trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) strategy compared to standard care pathways in people with inflammatory arthritis: a study protocol.

Trials·2026
Same journal

Scaling up community-based non-communicable disease research into practice in Pokhara Metropolitan City of Nepal (SCALE-NCD) trial: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2026
Same journal

EECP intervention and coronary flow reserve in chronic coronary syndrome: a protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled study in China (ECP-Core Trial).

Trials·2026
Same journal

Impact of early tracheostomy in infratentorial lesions trial: rationale and design.

Trials·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Facet-to-facet Linking of Shape-anisotropic Colloidal Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanostructures
09:12

Facet-to-facet Linking of Shape-anisotropic Colloidal Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanostructures

Published on: August 10, 2017

8.0K

The multiple facets of registry-based randomised controlled trials.

Bill Karanatsios1,2, Khic-Houy Prang3, Peter Gibbs4,5,6

  • 1Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. bill.karanatsios@wh.org.au.

Trials
|February 12, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Registry-based randomized controlled trials (RRCTs) offer efficient, valid clinical evidence. However, inconsistent definitions hinder adoption, necessitating standardized nomenclature and a proposed taxonomy for broader impact.

More Related Videos

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

58.8K
Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
03:26

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 8, 2024

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Facet-to-facet Linking of Shape-anisotropic Colloidal Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanostructures
09:12

Facet-to-facet Linking of Shape-anisotropic Colloidal Cadmium Chalcogenide Nanostructures

Published on: August 10, 2017

8.0K
The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

58.8K
Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
03:26

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 8, 2024

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical research methodology
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Health informatics

Background:

  • Traditional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the benchmark for clinical intervention evaluation.
  • Registry-based trials (RBTs) offer potential for high-quality evidence, improved validity, reduced complexity, and lower costs.
  • Slower-than-anticipated adoption of RBTs may stem from inconsistent definitions, often conflating RBTs with registry-based RCTs (RRCTs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the lack of consistent definitions and standardized nomenclature for registry-based randomized controlled trials (RRCTs).
  • To analyze the variability in RRCT definitions and reporting across clinical trial registries.
  • To propose a taxonomy and advocate for standardized registration practices to enhance RRCT recognition and impact.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of seven reviews focusing on registry-based randomized controlled trials (RRCTs).
  • Examination of variability in RRCT definitions and reporting within clinical trial registries.
  • Development of a proposed taxonomy for classifying RRCTs based on registry utilization.

Main Results:

  • Significant variability exists in how RRCTs are defined and reported across clinical trial registries.
  • Absence of standardized descriptors and nomenclature complicates accurate estimation of RRCT implementation and impact.
  • Reviews report widely varying numbers of trials registered as RRCTs due to definitional ambiguity.

Conclusions:

  • Clear, consistent definitions and consensus on standardized registration terms are essential for realizing the full potential of RRCTs.
  • A proposed two-tier RRCT classification is based on registry outcome capture and participant identification/recruitment use.
  • Standardized registration and a clear taxonomy will enhance RRCT recognition, impact on clinical practice, and guide future research.