Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring
Published on: October 24, 2025
Drone-based geospatial prediction modeling identifies Fasciola hepatica infection risk in the Cusco Highlands of Peru
Bryan Fernandez-Camacho1, Antony Barja1, Luis C Revilla1
1Health Innovation Laboratory, Institute of Tropical Medicine "Alexander Von Humboldt", Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Background:
Fascioliasis is a neglected infectious disease affecting agricultural communities worldwide, with the Peruvian Andes among the most severely affected regions. Identifying fine-scale environmental risk patterns could support targeted surveillance and control. We aimed to develop predictive models of Fasciola hepatica infection in humans and sheep using drone-derived environmental indices in a rural Andean community.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional study in the Huayllapata community, Cusco, Peru. Demographic, socioeconomic, and georeferenced infection data were collected from households and livestock with fascioliasis diagnosed by stool microscopy. High-resolution multispectral and thermal drone surveys were performed in April 2023 to derive environmental, topographic, and climatic indices. Logistic regression, random forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), and deep learning models were trained using literature-based or principal component analysis (PCA)-based variable selection strategies. Model performance was evaluated using standard and spatial cross validation approaches. Fine-scale probability surface maps were generated across the study area.
Results:
Human fascioliasis prevalence was 21.3% of households, while sheep prevalence reached 80%. Under standard cross validation, RF achieved the best performance for human infection using the literature-based approach (accuracy = 0.89, sensitivity = 0.99, specificity = 0.88), while XGB performed best using the PCA-based approach (accuracy = 0.85, sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.85). For sheep infection, XGB achieved the highest performance (accuracy = 0.93, sensitivity = 0.65, specificity = 0.93) with literature-based variables and RF performed best under the PCA-based approach (accuracy = 0.85, sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.86). Spatial cross-validation reduced accuracy and specificity across models but preserved high sensitivity. Probability maps revealed marked spatial heterogeneity in predicted risk within the community, with shifts in the location and magnitude of risk zones when spatial dependence was accounted for.
Conclusions:
In this single Andean community, machine learning models integrating drone-derived environmental, topographic and climatic indices, successfully identified F. hepatica infection occurrence in humans and sheep. RF and XGB showed the most robust performance under spatial cross-validation, supporting the feasibility of UAV-based approaches for localized F. hepatica risk mapping.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Relative Risk
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...

