Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Cigarette Smoke Exposure in Mice using a Whole-Body Inhalation System
Published on: October 22, 2020
Barriers and facilitators to enforcing E-cigarette regulations for online sales
Sangah Clara Lee1, Ginny Chadwick2,3, Gina R Kruse4
1Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Introduction:
Online sales of e-cigarettes challenge the enforcement of state tobacco control (TC) policies. Using key informant (KI) interviews, we examined barriers and facilitators to implementing TC policies in the context of e-cigarettes sold online.
Methods:
From April 2023 to December 2024, we invited state representatives from all 50 states and the District of Columbia to participate in KI interviews. Guided by Bullock's (2021) policy implementation framework, we examined licensure, minimum legal sales age, flavor bans, and taxation. Data were analyzed using team-based, iterative coding.
Results:
We conducted 74 semi-structured interviews with 90 KIs across 41 states, of which online sales emerged as a key theme in 41 interviews with 60 KIs across 34 states. KIs noted how online sales interacted with existing legal frameworks and enforcement methods, often creating challenges, including jurisdictional ambiguity over out-of-state or international sellers, limited capacity to monitor the emergence of new online sellers, statutory language not designed for digital commerce, supply chain ambiguity, and logistical difficulties in conducting online decoy buys. KIs noted several potential enforcement facilitators, including the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act (e.g., monthly delivery sales reports), consumer complaint systems, internet surveillance, directories of products authorized for sale, and interstate coordination of data sharing. Some states pursued legal action against online retailers using consumer protection laws.
Conclusions:
Online e-cigarette sales present a regulatory challenge for TC implementation, requiring policy adaptation, cross-jurisdictional coordination, enhanced monitoring, and research to guide effective regulation of the digital marketplace.
Implications:
This work may inform future policy and enforcement strategies by highlighting the unique regulatory gaps created by online e-cigarette sales. Traditional tobacco control mechanisms, developed initially for brick-and-mortar retailers, are not well-suited to the rapidly evolving online marketplace. Strengthening the utility of the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act by integrating reporting, shipping, and tax compliance data into state licensure, minimum legal sales age, flavor, and tax enforcement could help states more effectively detect noncompliant sellers. Complementary measures such as robust age verification, clearer statutory definitions, and partnerships with carriers, financial institutions, and technology platforms are critical to adapting tobacco control to the realities of digital commerce.
More Related Videos
09:30A Microcontroller Operated Device for the Generation of Liquid Extracts from Conventional Cigarette Smoke and Electronic Cigarette Aerosol
Published on: January 18, 2018
10:44Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System
Published on: May 24, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Facilitated Transport
Facilitated Transport
Social Facilitation
Facilitated Diffusion
In this process, substrates such as organic compounds and ions interact with a transporter on one side, triggering conformational changes in proteins that enable...
Chromatin Structure Regulates pre-mRNA Processing
The chromatin structure, especially...
Epigenetic Regulation