Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Development of a Larval Zebrafish Infection Model for Clostridioides difficile
Published on: February 14, 2020
A novel RNA nucleic acid amplification test more accurately distinguishes active Clostridioides difficile infection
Kenneth D Long1,2, Daniel J Silberger1, John Hernandez1
1Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Birmingham, AL, USA.
Abstract:
Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) is a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections with severity ranging from mild diarrhea to fulminant colitis and death. Current antigen tests lack adequate sensitivity and DNA-based nucleic acid amplification tests (DNA-NAATs) exhibit limited specificity for active infection, leading to either underdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment of colonized individuals. Unlike DNA, mRNA is expressed only by metabolically active bacteria and is rapidly hydrolyzed, providing natural advantages to distinguish active infection from colonization. In this study, we developed and evaluated a novel multiplexed reverse-transcriptase PCR assay (RNA-NAAT) targeting C. diff-specific sequences. No cross-reactivity was observed with other gastrointestinal pathogens, commensal enteric flora, or closely-related Clostridioides or Clostridium species. Toxin gene RNA expression was detected only in samples spiked with metabolically active C. diff at a limit of detection 30-to-50-fold less than current diagnostic methods. Sequential clinical samples (n=260) were collected in proprietary RNA-preservative solution from patients receiving standard of care C. diff diagnostic testing. All samples were evaluated with RNA-NAAT, Alere GDH/toxin EIA, Solana DNA-NAAT, and both forward- and reverse-2-Step Algorithms (2-SA). Samples yielding valid results on all platforms (n=239) with discordant test results (n=14) were adjudicated via toxigenic culture and blinded chart review by infectious disease physicians. RNA-NAAT outperformed all comparator test strategies, simultaneously exhibiting higher sensitivity and specificity, including a higher specificity for active infection than the specific toxin EIA (99.5% vs 98.2%) and a higher sensitivity for organism identification than the sensitive DNA-NAAT (100% vs 88.2%), with significantly reduced false positive test results (1 vs 7).
Related Concept Videos
Nucleic Acids
DNA and RNA
The two main types of nucleic acids are deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA). DNA is the genetic material in all living organisms, ranging from single-celled bacteria to multicellular mammals. It is in the nucleus of eukaryotes and in the organelles, chloroplasts, and mitochondria. In prokaryotes,...
Nucleic acids
DNA and RNA
The two main types of nucleic acids are deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA). DNA is the genetic material in all living organisms, ranging from single-celled bacteria to multicellular mammals. It is in the nucleus of eukaryotes and in the organelles, chloroplasts, and mitochondria. In prokaryotes,...
Nucleic Acids
Nucleic Acid Structure
DNA Structure
DNA...
Nucleic Acids and Nucleotides
Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA)
DNA is the genetic material in all living organisms, ranging from single-celled bacteria to multicellular mammals. It is in the nucleus of eukaryotes and the organelles such as chloroplasts and mitochondria....
Biosynthesis of Nucleic Acids

