Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Low-dose atropine for myopia progression in children: a 2017-2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized
Luciano Magurno1, Maximiliano Lang1, Martina Zapata1
1Instituto de Investigaciones en Medicina Traslacional (IIMT), Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Austral, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Pilar/Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Background:
Low-dose atropine (0.01%) eye drops have emerged as a proposed intervention to slow myopic progression in children, but their short-term efficacy remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized, placebo-controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of 0.01% atropine in preventing myopia progression.
Methods:
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (through October 2024) identified double-blind randomized trials published from 2017 to 2024 that compared atropine 0.01% with placebo in children. Primary outcomes were the changes in refractive error (spherical equivalent) and axial length over at least 1 year. Secondary outcomes included treatment-related adverse events (e.g., photophobia). Data were extracted, pooled using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed (I2 statistic).
Results:
Nine trials (n = 1,091) met inclusion. Spherical equivalent refraction (SER): MD +0.14 D/year (95% CI +0.04 to +0.24, p = 0.01; I2 = 64%). Axial length: MD -0.05 mm/year (95% CI -0.08 to -0.01, p = 0.01; I2 = 30%). Photophobia: RR 1.17 (95% CI 0.43-3.20, p = 0.69; I2 = 15%).
Conclusion:
At 12 months, 0.01% atropine yields small but statistically significant reductions in the progression of spherical-equivalent refraction and axial elongation, with no statistically significant increase in photophobia versus placebo, although absolute photophobia rates were higher in the atropine group (9.8% vs. 5.9%). Effects are modest and heterogeneous, and the 95% prediction intervals include the null, supporting the need for larger, longer-term trials to define the durability and clinical relevance of these findings.
Systematic Review Registration:
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024583729.
Related Concept Videos
Random and Systematic Errors
The Placebo Effect
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview

