Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing
Published on: May 8, 2021
Blood Pressure, Urinalysis, and Edema Assessment in Perinatal Care: From Historical Foundations to Evidence-Based
Yoshitsugu Chigusa1, Kazuki Yamano1,2, Taito Miyamoto1
1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Insights
Standard prenatal care involving blood pressure, urine, and edema checks aids early detection of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. However, more research is needed to confirm their impact on pregnancy outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- The triad of blood pressure, urinalysis, and edema assessment has been integral to prenatal care for over 80 years.
- Historically, these assessments were crucial for diagnosing and treating hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), a major cause of maternal mortality.
- While vital for early HDP detection, conclusive evidence linking these routine checks to improved pregnancy and delivery outcomes is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the historical evolution and contemporary role of blood pressure, urinalysis, and edema assessment in perinatal care.
- To critically examine the evidence supporting the clinical utility of these traditional prenatal assessments.
- To identify unresolved issues and areas requiring further research for each assessment category.
Main Methods:
- Historical review of prenatal care practices.
- Critical analysis of existing literature on blood pressure, urinalysis, and edema assessment in pregnancy.
- Examination of the link between these assessments and maternal-fetal outcomes.
Main Results:
- The triad has historically aided in the early diagnosis and management of HDP.
- Limitations exist in current practices: optimal blood pressure thresholds, standardized postpartum proteinuria criteria, and evidence for pathological edema management are lacking.
- The noninvasive nature and low cost of these assessments highlight their potential for cost-effective healthcare.
Conclusions:
- While historically significant, the direct impact of the triad on pregnancy outcomes requires further evidence-based validation.
- Establishing optimal thresholds and standardized protocols for each component is crucial for maximizing their clinical utility.
- Further research is needed to solidify the evidence base, potentially optimizing maternal and fetal outcomes while maintaining cost-effective care.
Abstract:
The triad of blood pressure measurement, urinalysis, and edema assessment has constituted the cornerstone of prenatal care for over eight decades and has been consistently recorded at each examination in Japan's Maternal and Child Health Handbook. Historically, these examinations were prioritized to facilitate the early diagnosis and treatment of pregnancy toxemia-now termed hypertensive disorders of pregnancy-which once represented a leading cause of maternal mortality. The triad has undeniably played a pivotal role in the early diagnosis, prediction, and treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, while potentially contributing to the detection of other obstetric complications. However, conclusive evidence linking these conventionally performed assessments to actual pregnancy and delivery outcomes remains limited, and critical unresolved issues persist within each examination category. Blood pressure assessment requires the establishment of optimal blood pressure thresholds to achieve favorable pregnancy and perinatal outcomes; to achieve this, home blood pressure monitoring should be adopted. Evidence-based target blood pressure ranges for treatment initiation in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and therapeutic targets are urgently needed. For urinary protein assessment, the establishment of standardized criteria for postpartum proteinuria follow-up is essential. In terms of edema, critical evidence is lacking regarding the evaluation and treatment of pathological edema that adversely affects pregnancy outcomes. This review traces the historical evolution of these examinations while critically examining their contemporary role in perinatal care. A notable characteristic of this triad is its noninvasive nature and minimal cost burden. The establishment of robust evidence supporting their clinical utility could optimize maternal and fetal outcomes while maintaining cost-effective healthcare delivery.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice
Theories provide a perspective to assess patients' conditions and organize data and methods. They also assist in analyzing and interpreting information. They represent a...
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
The Evidence for Evolution
Blood Pressure

