Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
Published on: July 27, 2022
The Polysubstance Assessment Tool: Reliability, acceptability and feasibility of a novel measure of polysubstance use
Amanda M Bunting1, Charles M Cleland1, S Michaela Barratt1
1Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Background And Aims:
There are currently no brief quantitative assessments that capture the drug patterns of people who engage in use of more than one drug on the same day or simultaneously. The current study examined the retest reliability, acceptability and feasibility of a new quantitative assessment to measure polysubstance use.
Design:
A tool for assessing simultaneous and same-day polysubstance behaviors, the polysubstance assessment tool (PAT) was developed in interviewer-administered and electronic self-administered formats. Participants were allocated 1:1 to receive either version of the PAT and returned one to three days later to repeat the assessment.
Setting:
New York City, New York, USA.
Participants:
Adults (18 + years, n = 115) who reported use of more than one drug per day in the last 30 days.
Measurements:
Test-retest reliability estimates for dichotomous items were assessed using Cohen's kappa, Gwet's Agreement Coefficient 1 (AC1) and percent agreement. Continuous items were assessed with two-way mixed effects intraclass correlations. Bivariate analyses examined acceptability using nine Likert-type survey questions. Feasibility was examined via time to completion.
Findings:
Overall reliability was moderate to excellent [Gwet's AC1 range 0.70-0.96; intraclass correlation (ICC) range 0.62-0.88]. Reliability was higher for simultaneous polysubstance use (Gwet's AC1 = 0.90) as compared with same-day (Gwet's AC1 = 0.70). Acceptability was high, with no statistically significant difference between the self- and interviewer-administered versions of the tool. Median time to completion was 7 minutes, and was statistically significantly lower for the self-administered tool (median = 5 minutes) compared with the interviewer-administered version (median = 8 minutes) (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
A new polysubstance assessment tool appears to have good reliability and can be considered by researchers seeking a quantitative measure of polysubstance use behaviors given its simplicity, high acceptability and quick completion time.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
Distribution Reliability and Automation
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Overview of Microsoft Excel as a Data Analysis Tool
Measurement: Derived Units

