Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
Published on: July 22, 2025
External validation of GDM risk prediction models using a machine learning reciprocal model-exchange framework
Mark Germaine1, Yitayeh Belsti2, Amy O'Higgins3
1School of Computing, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland; School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland; Research Ireland Centre for Research Training in Machine Learning, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Background:
Although many risk prediction models have been developed, very few undergo external validation, primarily due to issues with data access. Therefore, we implemented a reciprocal model-exchange approach to facilitate external validation and demonstrate its use with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prediction models.
Objective:
To assess the robustness and generalisability of two independently developed GDM risk prediction models using a reciprocal model-exchange framework.
Methods:
Two independently developed GDM risk prediction models were externally validated using a reciprocal model-exchange. The saved model's corresponding variable types and data pre-processor were exchanged. The Monash CatBoost model was validated using Irish data at Dublin City University (DCU), and the DCU logistic-regression GDM model was validated using Australian data at Monash University. Performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis. Model fairness was assessed.
Results:
The prevalence of GDM was 21.1% in the Australian cohort and 11.7% in the Irish cohort. The Monash model's AUC dropped from 0.93 to 0.77, while the DCU model's AUC fell from 0.82 to 0.69. Calibration estimates confirmed systematic risk misestimation; each model tends to over or under-predict GDM probabilities outside its training domain, with calibration-in-the-large of -0.573 for the Monash model and 0.17 for the DCU model; slopes were 1.278 and 0.55 respectively. Both models showed performance variability across ethnic groups, with lower performance for Southeast/Northeast Asians and both performed better with increasing parity and among women without a prior GDM diagnosis.
Conclusions:
Each model's performance decreased upon external validation, and the fairness evaluations on the different sub-categories (ethnicities; parity and previous GDM) provided evidence on the areas to be addressed in model recalibration/updating before deployment can be progressed. This reciprocal model-exchange approach provides a solution to facilitating external validations, which are notably lacking in the current literature but are necessary to advance the risk prediction field.
Related Concept Videos
Simplified Synchronous Machine Model
In this model, each generator is connected to a...
Wind Turbine Machine Models
Induction machines interact through the rotating magnetic field generated by the stator and the rotor. The key parameter is slip, which is the difference between synchronous speed and rotor speed relative to synchronous speed. Slip is...
Social Exchange Theory
Reliability and Validity
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity
Gas Exchange and Transport

