Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
Published on: April 1, 2016
Methods for Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints for Health Technology Assessment Decision Making: A Good Practices
Sylwia Bujkiewicz1, Oriana Ciani2, Bart Heeg3
1Biostatistics Research Group, Division of Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
None:
Surrogate endpoints are frequently used as primary outcomes in clinical trials. This is appropriate when they are validated for their ability to predict clinical benefit measured on patient-relevant target outcome(s). Such validation is often lacking, thus increasing uncertainty in the decision-making process of regulatory bodies, health technology assessment agencies and payers. This ISPOR Task Force Report provides recommendations on best practices for surrogate endpoint evaluation for health technology assessment decision making. It covers methods that address the 3 levels of evidence for surrogate endpoint validation described in several methodological guidelines: (1) association between treatment effects on the surrogate and the target outcome, (2) association between the surrogate and the target outcome, and (3) biological plausibility. Statistical methods for surrogate endpoint evaluation include meta-analytic approaches using individual participant data or aggregate data. Multivariate meta-analytic models are recommended because they account for the within-study correlation and estimation errors. Issues with limited data and generalizability might be addressed through Bayesian approaches for information sharing from different treatments, treatment classes or indications. Real-world data can complement randomized controlled trial data, especially in rare diseases, but require careful consideration of underlying bias. For plausibility of health economic modeling, the surrogacy analysis and the health economic model should be aligned. The modeled time course of surrogate and target outcomes per treatment arm, as well as the modeled relative effects, should be reported to assess plausibility. Parameter and structural uncertainty in surrogate relationships can be explored through scenario analyses, probabilistic sensitivity analyses, value of information analyses, and threshold analysis techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation Titration: Endpoint Detection Methods
In the Volhard method, a standard excess of AgNO3 is first added to the...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Data Reporting and Recording
Intermolecular Forces

