Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Contrast Enhanced Vessel Imaging using MicroCT
Published on: January 27, 2011
Impact of common artefacts on mass visibility in contrast-enhanced mammography: A virtual imaging trial
Katrien Houbrechts1, Lesley Cockmartin2, Liesbeth Vancoillie3
1Department of Imaging and Pathology, Division of Medical Physics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Background:
Artefacts in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) can compromise diagnostic image quality. These artefacts may obscure clinically relevant findings or mimic pathological features, potentially leading to misinterpretation.
Purpose:
A virtual imaging trial technique was used to quantify the impact of breast-in-breast and motion artefacts on lesion contrast and signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) in CEM.
Methods:
Computational breast phantoms representing four breast density categories were generated, and 5 mm diameter non-spiculated masses were embedded centrally and peripherally to study the influence of density and the breast-in-breast artefact. Motion artefacts were simulated using two techniques: horizontal and vertical translation of the entire phantom between the low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) acquisitions, and simulation of partial paddle release between the two exposures. A Monte Carlo (MC) method was used to model the LE and HE images generated by a Siemens MAMMOMAT B.brilliant system. An offline algorithm with motion correction generated the recombined images. Lesion contrast and SDNR were evaluated for simulated masses with clinically relevant iodine concentrations derived from patient data and QC phantoms.
Results:
The breast-in-breast artefact causes contrast and SDNR reductions of up to 76% for peripheral lesions. There was a slight increase in these parameters as breast density increased, due to the fixed weighting factor used by the recombination algorithm. Simulated rigid and non-rigid motion reduced SDNR by up to 60% before motion correction. Activation of the motion correction algorithm preserved SDNR for small in-plane displacements, although some residual artefacts remained for non-rigid motion.
Conclusions:
This study highlights the challenges posed by non-uniform breast thickness at the borders and emphasizes the importance of motion correction. Virtual imaging trials provide a powerful, controlled method to study these effects, offering insights that are challenging to obtain from clinical or physical phantom studies alone.
Related Concept Videos
Mass Analyzers: Common Types
Common Ion Effect
Virtual Work
In static equilibrium, a body can experience an imaginary or virtual movement, such as displacement or rotation. The virtual work done by a force is equal to the dot product of force and virtual displacement in the direction of the force. When it comes to virtually rotating a...
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

