Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.0K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.0K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

10.1K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
10.1K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.8K
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

253
Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
253
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

256
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
256
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

164
Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
164

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Granular Jamming in Soft Robotics: Simulation Frameworks and Emerging Possibilities-Review.

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Negative impact of very mild volume overload on the heart function in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

Renal failure·2026
Same author

Advanced Production, Processing and Characterization of Industrial Materials.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Stiffness and Density Relationships in Additively Manufactured Structures: A Virial Theorem-Based Approach.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Analysis of Various Factors' Influence and Optimization of Low-Temperature Combustion Technology.

ACS omega·2024
Same author

Pedestrian Safety in Frontal Tram Collision, Part 1: Historical Overview and Experimental-Data-Based Biomechanical Study of Head Clashing in Frontal and Side Impacts.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 14, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K

A Case Study of Applying Generative Design to Gear Wheels.

Matúš Virostko1, Silvia Maláková1, Melichar Kopas1

  • 1Department of Engineering for Design of Machines and Transport Equipment, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Letna No. 9, 042 00 Kosice, Slovakia.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 13, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Generative design significantly reduces spur gear mass by up to 45.68% while maintaining stiffness. Manufacturing constraints critically influence optimized gear designs, guiding technology selection for improved performance.

Keywords:
generative designmanufacturing/technological constraintsmaterial selectionproduction technologiesspur gear

More Related Videos

Recording and Analysis of Circadian Rhythms in Running-wheel Activity in Rodents
05:46

Recording and Analysis of Circadian Rhythms in Running-wheel Activity in Rodents

Published on: January 24, 2013

22.1K
Design of a Cyclic Pressure Bioreactor for the Ex Vivo Study of Aortic Heart Valves
07:12

Design of a Cyclic Pressure Bioreactor for the Ex Vivo Study of Aortic Heart Valves

Published on: August 23, 2011

16.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 14, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K
Recording and Analysis of Circadian Rhythms in Running-wheel Activity in Rodents
05:46

Recording and Analysis of Circadian Rhythms in Running-wheel Activity in Rodents

Published on: January 24, 2013

22.1K
Design of a Cyclic Pressure Bioreactor for the Ex Vivo Study of Aortic Heart Valves
07:12

Design of a Cyclic Pressure Bioreactor for the Ex Vivo Study of Aortic Heart Valves

Published on: August 23, 2011

16.3K

Area of Science:

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computational Design
  • Manufacturing Processes

Background:

  • Generative design offers potential for optimizing component geometry.
  • Integrating manufacturing constraints is crucial for practical generative design applications.
  • Spur gears are critical components requiring efficient and robust design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply generative design for spur gear body shape optimization.
  • To evaluate the impact of different manufacturing constraints (additive manufacturing, machining, casting) on gear design.
  • To assess weight reduction and stiffness performance of optimized gear designs.

Main Methods:

  • A finite element-based generative design workflow was utilized.
  • Numerical simulations and finite element analysis were employed for evaluation.
  • Designs were optimized considering material properties and specific manufacturing routes.

Main Results:

  • Generative design achieved mass reductions of 37.46-45.68% compared to reference geometry.
  • Additive manufacturing constraints yielded the highest weight savings.
  • Machining constraints resulted in designs with higher structural stiffness (lower deformation).
  • Casting constraints produced conservative geometries with localized reinforcement.

Conclusions:

  • Manufacturing constraints are key variables in generative design, significantly influencing geometry and mechanical response.
  • Generative design provides a viable methodology for early-stage optimization of gear bodies.
  • The study supports informed decisions on manufacturing technology selection for optimized components.