Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Studying Triple Negative Breast Cancer Using Orthotopic Breast Cancer Model
Published on: March 20, 2020
Integrating Large Language Models with Deep Learning for Breast Cancer Treatment Decision Support
Heeseung Park1,2, Serin Ok3, Taewoo Kang1,2
1Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, Republic of Korea.
None:
Background/Objectives: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies, but its heterogeneous molecular subtypes make treatment decision-making complex and patient-specific. Both the pathology reports and the electronic medical record (EMR) play a critical role for an appropriate treatment decision. This study aimed to develop an integrated clinical decision support system (CDSS) that combines a large language model (LLM)-based pathology analysis with deep learning-based treatment prediction to support standardized and reliable decision-making. Methods: Real-world data (RWD) obtained from a cohort of 5015 patients diagnosed with breast cancer were analyzed. Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct automatically extracted the TNM stage and tumor size from the pathology reports, which were then integrated with EMR variables. A multi-label classification of 16 treatment combinations was performed using six models, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, GBM, XGBoost, DNN, and Transformer. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, macro/micro-averaged precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC. Results: Using combined LLM-extracted pathology and EMR features, GBM and XGBoost achieved the highest and most stable predictive performance across all feature subset configurations (macro-F1 ≈ 0.88-0.89; AUC = 0.867-0.868). Both models demonstrated strong discrimination ability and consistent recall and precision, highlighting their robustness for multi-label classification in real-world settings. Decision Tree and Random Forest showed moderate but reliable performance (macro-F1 = 0.84-0.86; AUC = 0.849-0.821), indicating their applicability despite lower predictive capability. By contrast, the DNN and Transformer models produced comparatively lower scores (macro-F1 = 0.74-0.82; AUC = 0.780-0.757), especially when using the full feature set, suggesting limited suitability for structured clinical data without strong contextual dependencies. These findings indicate that gradient-boosting ensemble approaches are better optimized for tabular medical data and generate more clinically reliable treatment recommendations. Conclusions: The proposed artificial intelligence-based CDSS improves accuracy and consistency in breast cancer treatment decision support by integrating automated pathology interpretation with deep learning, demonstrating its potential utility in real-world cancer care.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Language
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...
Components of Language
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Language and Cognition
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...

