Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Anti-RDL and Anti-mGlutR1 Receptors Antibody Testing in Honeybee Brain Sections using CRISPR-Cas9
Published on: January 30, 2020
Integrating Anti-Phosphatidylserine/Prothrombin Antibodies Testing into Antiphospholipid Syndrome Diagnostics: A
Michele Cioffi1,2, Valentina Oddone1,2, Massimo Radin1,2
1University Center of Excellence on Nephrologic, Rheumatologic and Rare Diseases (ERK-Net, ERN-Reconnect and RITA-ERN Member) with Nephrology and Dialysis Unit and Center of Immuno-Rheumatology and Rare Diseases (CMID), Coordinating Center of the Interregional Network for Rare Diseases of Piedmont and Aosta Valley, ASL Città di Torino, San Giovanni Bosco Hub Hospital, 10154 Turin, Italy.
None:
Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed by characteristic clinical manifestations supported by positivity for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies. However, a proportion of patients, especially those with systemic lupus erythematosus, remain seronegative despite high clinical suspicion. Anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) have emerged as potential biomarkers in this setting. We conducted an expert perception-based Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to evaluate the clinical, ethical, and organizational impact of implementing aPS/PT testing. Methods: A structured HTA was performed across five domains: safety, perceived efficacy, equity, ethics, and organizational implications. A survey was distributed to 110 APS specialists; 50 experts contributed responses (45.5% response rate; 66% clinicians, 18% laboratory personnel, 8% nurses, 8% administrative/other). For each domain, Z-scores were calculated to compare current diagnostic practice (AS IS) with a scenario integrating aPS/PT testing (TO BE). Correlation analyses explored relationships across domains. Results: Across all five domains, the TO BE scenario scored substantially higher than standard practice. The largest improvements were observed in perceived diagnostic efficacy (ΔZ = +2.65) and safety (ΔZ = +2.03), followed by equity (ΔZ = +2.25), ethical/social impact (ΔZ = +1.96), and organizational feasibility (ΔZ = +1.61). Perceived diagnostic effectiveness showed a strong positive correlation with both equity (r = 0.70, p < 0.001) and ethics (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). Participants consistently rated the assay as safe, clinically useful, equitable, and organizationally easy to introduce in routine laboratory workflows. Conclusions: Experts perceived the addition of aPS/PT testing as a meaningful enhancement to APS diagnostics, particularly for SLE patients who are seronegative on conventional assays. Its favorable profile across all HTA domains supports further evaluation in prospective cohorts and consideration for integration into future diagnostic algorithms.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests

