Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Intra-Peritoneal Transplantation for Generating Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Mice
Published on: January 6, 2023
Impact of Fusion Partners and Transplantation Benefit in Intensively Treated KMT2A-Rearranged Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Heng Shen1,2, Jiayuan Chen1,2, Xiaoyuan Gong1,2
1State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China.
Background:
KMT2A rearrangements are a frequent genetic abnormality associated with Acute myeloid leukemia (AML), historically linked to varied prognoses and outcomes. The prognosis for patients with this rearrangement remains controversial, necessitating further research to stratify risk and guide treatment.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, a total of 3468 adolescent and adult AML patients were screened, and 181 patients harboring KMT2A rearrangements were analyzed. We used FISH, RT-PCR, and next-generation sequencing, including transcriptome and targeted panels, for diagnosis and mutation profiling. All patients received intensive chemotherapy. We evaluated overall survival and event-free survival using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models, with HSCT analyzed as a time-dependent variable.
Results:
The incidence of KMT2A-rearranged AML in our newly diagnosed cohort was 5.9%. Among the 181 patients included in the final analysis, 89 (49.2%) were male and 92 (50.8%) were female, with a median age of 33 years (range: 13-65). The distribution of fusion partners included KMT2A::MLLT3 (n = 39), KMT2A::AFDN (n = 27), KMT2A::MLLT10 (n = 25), KMT2A::ELL (n = 24), and others (n = 12). Seventy-four patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in first complete remission (CR1). The median follow-up for survivors was 17.53 months (range 1.47-112.57), and the 3-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) for the entire cohort were 42.0% and 32.1%, respectively. Patients with KMT2A::ELL exhibited superior OS compared to other subtypes (3-year OS [ELL vs. non-ELL]: 59.8% vs. 39.3%, p = 0.023). Concomitant mutations did not significantly impact the prognosis of KMT2A-rearranged AML patients. In multivariate analysis, age and HSCT in CR1 were independently associated with OS and EFS (OS: HR = 1.022, p = 0.026 [age]; HR = 0.238, p < 0.001 [HSCT]; EFS: HR = 1.027, p = 0.002 [age]; HR = 0.155, p < 0.001 [HSCT]). Patients aged over 20 years were more likely to benefit from HSCT than those aged 20 years or younger (p < 0.001 [age > 20], p = 0.780 [age ≤ 20]).
Conclusions:
Our study revealed the heterogeneous outcomes of KMT2A-rearranged AML patients and clarified the impact of HSCT across different age groups.
More Related Videos
09:01Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
Published on: March 26, 2018
08:31Murine Model of Leukemia Relapse to Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Published on: October 17, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Nuclear Fusion
A helium nucleus has a mass that is 0.7% less than that of four hydrogen nuclei; this lost mass is converted into energy during the fusion. This reaction produces about...
Benefits of Self-Esteem
[3,3] Sigmatropic Rearrangement of 1,5-Dienes: Cope Rearrangement
[3,3] Sigmatropic Rearrangement of Allyl Vinyl Ethers: Claisen Rearrangement
Preparation of Diols and Pinacol Rearrangement
The reaction begins with transferring a proton from the acid catalyst to one of the hydroxyl groups, producing an oxonium ion.
Impact of Groups on Groups