Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Screening for Melanoma Modifiers using a Zebrafish Autochthonous Tumor Model
Published on: November 13, 2012
Impact of Dermatologic Screening and Methods on Breslow Thickness in Melanoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Katharina Wunderlich1, Apolline Potiez1, Carmen Orte Cano1
1Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Background/Objectives:
Melanoma is the most lethal cutaneous neoplasm, with Breslow thickness being a key prognostic factor. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the impact of screening frequency and diagnostic methods on tumour stage at diagnosis and to explore implications for risk-adapted strategies.
Methods:
Between 2017 and 2024, 475 cases of melanoma were diagnosed in 397 patients. Screening frequency, diagnostic method, and patient risk were analyzed in relation to tumour stage.
Results:
Compared with first-visit cases, patients who underwent screening within two years prior to diagnosis were more often diagnosed with melanoma in situ (32.6% vs. 44-51%; p < 0.05) and had thinner invasive tumours (0.68-0.73 mm vs. 1.8 mm; p ≤ 0.001), though no differences were seen between screening frequencies. Full-body examination was associated with more in situ melanomas (46% vs. 34%; p = 0.016) and thinner invasive tumours (0.92 vs. 2.05 mm; p = 0.2) compared with lesion-directed screening, but this effect disappeared after excluding first-visit cases. Invasive melanomas diagnosed by mole mapping were significantly thinner than by dermoscopy (0.55 vs. 1.07; p = 0.035). In high-risk patients, tumour thickness decreased with more frequent visits (0.905 mm without screening vs. 0.40-0.55 mm with ≥1 visit; p = 0.001). Moreover, mole mapping identified thinner melanomas in the high-risk group compared with dermoscopy (0.47 vs. 0.60 mm; p = 0.02).
Conclusions:
Screening is associated with thinner melanomas and more in situ diagnoses. Digital mole mapping offers additional benefits, with high-risk patients profiting most, while low-risk individuals could be managed with less resource-intensive approaches. These findings support risk-adapted screening strategies focusing on intensive, digitally supported modalities for high-risk groups.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Groups on Groups
Impact
When particles with different initial velocities collide, they induce deformation by applying equal and opposite impulses. At the point of maximum deformation, the particles move together with...
Impact of Groups on Individuals
Impact of Individuals on a Group
Impact of Schemas
Types of Impact
The coefficient of restitution is a metric for understanding the dynamics of impacts. It quantifies the ratio of relative velocity...

