Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands
Published on: August 29, 2019
Assessment of PlanetScope Spectral Data for Estimation of Peanut Leaf Area Index Using Machine Learning and
Michael Ekwe1,2, Hansanee Fernando3, Godstime James1
1Department of Strategic Space Application, National Space Research and Development Agency, Airport Road, P.M.B. 437, Abuja 900101, Nigeria.
None:
Leaf area index (LAI) is a key indicator of crop growth and development and is widely used in both agricultural research and precision farming applications. PlanetScope imagery is generally used for monitoring crop growth due to its high revisit frequency, broad spatial coverage, and cost-effective access to consistent high-resolution multispectral data. Therefore, we developed regression models to estimate peanut LAI, combining PlanetScope spectral bands and vegetation indices (VIs). Specifically, we compared the performance of random forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) regression algorithms for peanut LAI estimation. Our results showed that most of the VIs exhibited strong relationships with LAI. Thirteen VIs were individually evaluated for estimating LAI using the aforementioned algorithms, and our results showed that the best single predictors of LAI are: TSAVI (RF: R2 = 0.87, RMSE = 0.83 m2/m2, RRMSE = 24.20%; XGBoost: R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 0.95 m2/m2, RRMSE = 27.96%); and RTVIcore (PLSR: R2 = 0.68, RMSE = 1.12 m2/m2, RRMSE = 32.88%). The top six ranked VIs were used to calibrate the RF, XGBoost, and PLSR algorithms. Model validation indicated that RF achieved the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.844, RMSE = 0.858 m2/m2, RRMSE = 25.17%), followed by XGBoost (R2 = 0.808, RMSE = 0.92 m2/m2, RRMSE = 26.99%), whereas PLSR showed comparatively lower performance (R2 = 0.76, RMSE = 0.983 m2/m2, RRMSE = 28.85%). Further results showed that PlanetScope VIs provided superior model accuracy in estimating peanut LAI compared to the use of spectral bands alone. Additionally, integrating spectral bands with VIs reduced LAI estimation accuracy, underscoring the importance of selecting predictor variables in ensuring optimal model performance. Overall, the presented results are significant for future crop monitoring using RF to reduce overreliance on multiple models for peanut LAI estimation.
More Related Videos
09:44RNAi-mediated Control of Aflatoxins in Peanut: Method to Analyze Mycotoxin Production and Transgene Expression in the Peanut/Aspergillus Pathosystem
Published on: December 21, 2015
09:34A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data
Published on: September 25, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA
One-way ANOVA is applied when a single independent variable or factor is scrutinized. It compares...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Statistical Significance